Milestone Two
Attachments
IHP 610 Milestone Two Guidelines and Rubric
Description: For your second milestone in your final project, you will develop a factual overview of your chosen issue, addressing in detail the following
elements:
A. Describe the importance of the issue to the healthcare organization.
B. Identify the key organizational stakeholders involved in the issue. Review the facts and consider whether any stakeholders are involved in the issue who
may not be immediately apparent upon casual observation.
C. Explain how key stakeholders played a role in shaping the health law and policy issue identified in the scenario.
D. Identify potential legal risks and malpractice issues that apply. Be sure to provide evidence or examples to support your response.
E. Identify potential value conflicts among key stakeholders. Be sure to provide evidence or examples to support your response.
Remember, this is a first draft. You will have the opportunity to incorporate instructor feedback and revise the factual overview for your final submission in
Module Nine.
Guidelines for Submission: Your factual overview should be 2 to 3 pages in length. It should be formatted in 12-point Times New Roman font, double-spaced,
with one-inch margins. All citations and references should be formatted according to current APA guidelines.
Critical Elements Proficient (100%) Needs Improvement (75%) Not Evident (0%) Value
Overview: Importance Logically describes the
importance of the issue to the
healthcare organization
Describes the importance of
the issue to the healthcare
organization, but with gaps in
logic or required detail
Does not describe the
importance of the issue to the
healthcare organization
20
Overview:
Stakeholders
Accurately identifies key
organizational stakeholders
involved in the issue
Identifies key organizational
stakeholders involved in the
issue, but with gaps in
accuracy or detail
Does not identify key
organizational stakeholders
involved in the issue
20
Overview: Role Logically explains how
identified stakeholders played
a role in shaping the health
law and policy issue in the
selected scenario
Explains how identified
stakeholders played a role in
shaping the health law and
policy issue in the selected
scenario, but with gaps in logic
or detail
Does not explain how
identified stakeholders played
a role in shaping the health
law and policy issue in the
selected scenario
15
Overview: Legal Risks
and Malpractice Issues
Accurately identifies potential
legal risks and malpractice
issues, providing evidence or
examples to support response
Identifies potential legal risks
and malpractice issues,
providing evidence or
examples to support response,
but with gaps in accuracy,
detail, or relevant support
Does not identify potential
legal risks and malpractice
issues and does not provide
evidence or examples to
support response
20
Overview: Value
Conflicts
Accurately identifies potential
value conflicts among
stakeholders, providing
evidence or examples to
support response
Identifies potential value
conflicts among stakeholders,
providing evidence or
examples to support response,
but with gaps in accuracy,
detail, or relevant support
Does not identify potential
value conflicts among
stakeholders and does not
provide evidence or examples
to support response
15
Articulation of
Response
Submission has no major
errors related to citations,
grammar, spelling, syntax, or
organization
Submission has major errors
related to citations, grammar,
spelling, syntax, or
organization that negatively
impact readability and
articulation of main ideas
Submission has critical errors
related to citations, grammar,
spelling, syntax, or
organization that prevent
understanding of ideas
10
Total 100%