Case study on hypertesion and chest pains.

History of Present Illness:

Mr. AS, an 85 year old, Caucasian male, with a history of hypertension and chest pain presents today not knowing how he got to the assisted living facility. The patient states he arrived at the facility 3 years ago, unaware of how he got there or why (the chart states his arrival as April 28, 2009). Mr. AS states that he was told he had a stroke, and was aware that his legs were not working correctly. He doesn’t remember having the stroke, but states that he was 83 years old when it happened. He now has lost the ability to walk and has also given up trying. His legs and arms feel weak. His arms hurt from trying to use his walker.

He currently does not lift weights to strengthen his arms so that they don’t get as exhausted when using his walker. Patient denies any prickling or tingling sensations. He also only exercises with his walker when he is made to, once a day during physical therapy. He states that he would rather use his wheelchair. He states that he has accepted the fact that he will not walk again, but is content just breathing and talking. He is not in any pain currently, still has feeling in his legs, but cannot move them. He also states that he was diagnosed with early stages of Alzheimers’ 30 years ago. His chart states that he was diagnosed with dementia at 55 years old. Patient is oriented to time and place, however, he has trouble remembering what he did yesterday. He can recall memories from years ago. He also states that he spends most of his day sleeping, but doesn’t feel tired, rather feels rested. Mr. AS also complains of coughing, that sometimes produces a clear sputum. He states that he was a smoker 20 years ago, for 40 years, with a 160 pack year history. He occasionally wheezes.

Past Medical History:

Current Medication List:

Mirtazapine 15 mg tablet PO once at bedtime for depression.

Namenda 10 mg tablet PO every 12 hours for Alzheimer’s.

Allopurinol 300 mg tablet PO 1 daily for hyperuricemia.

Aspirin single tablet chewable PO 81 mg to reduce the risk of heart attack and stroke, and pain relief.

Certavite antioxidant tablet 18 mg PO 1 daily as multivitamin and mineral supplement.

Loratadine 10 mg 1 tablet PO 1 daily for rhinorrhea/allergies.

Nifedipine 90 mg tablet PO 1 daily for chest pain and hypertension.

Metoprolol tartrate 25 mg PO 1 tablet daily for chest pain hypertension.

Nasal decongestant 0.05%SP 2 sprays per nostril 2 times a day for rhinorrhea/allergies.

Omeprazole 20 mg 1 table PO 2x a day for ulcers/ GERD.

Aricept 10 mg 1 tablet PO at bedtime for dementia.

Tamsulosin HCL 0.4mg capsule 1 PO at bedtime for benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Zolpidem tartrate 5 mg tablet 1 PO at bedtime as a sleep aid.

Acetaminophen 500 mg tablet give 2 tablespoon PO every 6 hours as needed for high temperatures.

Patient diagnosed with hypertension when he was 40 years old (currently controlled with medication). Patient states that he had a pace maker put in when he was 45 years old, and thinks it was to relieve chest pain. Patient thinks that he has been told he has high cholesterol, but he is unsure. Patients’ chart states that he has a history of hypertension, respiratory treatment, and chest pain. Patient was diagnosed with dementia at the age of 55, and had a stroke at 83 years old. Patient also had appendectomy due to appendicitis and an inguinal hernia repair when he was 10 years old. Patient has no known allergies.

Family History:

The patient states that he has one living adult son who calls often, but doesn’t visit much as he is overweight and has back pain. He remembers that one of his grandmothers’ passed away from TB, but he could not recall when. He has no grandchildren, and does not recall how anyone else in his family passed away. He states that he has no family history of hypertension, cancer, heart disease, diabetes mellitus, or psychiatric disease. He was married twice, and both wives are now deceased, but he does not remember when or the cause of death for either wife. No other information could be appreciated from the chart or patient, so a family member will need to be contacted to assess his risk for diseases.

Social History:

He currently has a girlfriend who lives in Miami Beach. The patient states that he currently is not sexually active, does not drink, do drugs, or smoke nicotine. He stopped smoking 20 years ago, but before that he smoked for 40-50 years, 4 packs a day (160 pack year history). Currently he does not follow a diet at the ALF, but eats what they feed him every day. He states that he builds clocks during the day as a hobby, and this keeps him happy.

Review of Systems:

General: Patient denies any fatigue, weight or appetite changes.

Skin: Patient denies any changes.

Head: Patient denies headaches, bumps/bruises, or dizziness.

Eyes: Patient states that he no longer needs to wear glasses since the stroke, as he can now see.

Ears: Patient can’t hear out of the left ear, but states that his right ear is fine.

Nose/Throat/Mouth: Patient denies any changes in smell or taste, or problems swallowing. He feels tickling in his throat when he talks too much.

Respiratory: Patient states that he has a constant cough, which sometimes produces clear sputum. He also occasionally wheezes and states that he had asthma as an adult and has used an inhaler.

Cardiovascular: Patient denies any pain, but states he has a pace maker. He denies palpitations as well.

Gastrointestinal: Patient denies any pain or cramping. Patient has been constipated for the past 20-30 years, only defecating once a month.

Genitourinary: He urinates 2-3 times a day, but has no control, and must wear a diaper. Patient denies polydipsia or hematuria.

Neurologic: See HPI

Musculoskeletal: See HPI

Endocrine: Patient denies any excessive thirst, changes in appetite, or weight changes.

Hematopoetic: Patient denies any skin color changes, easy bruising, or bleeding.

Psychiatric: SIGECAPS negative, and patient denies depression, fluctuating moods, or suicidal thoughts. See HPI

Physical Examination:

Vital Signs: Temp afebrile to touch, BP 132/72, pulse 60 bpm, RR 16 bpm, BMI 29

General: Overweight male currently not in respiratory or cardiac distress.

Skin: Darker brown discolored non-raised plaques on both arms, skin dry and warm to touch. Ulcers present on right ankle (2 cm wide, circular, and 1 cm above medial malleolus) and left shin (3 cm wide, circular, and 6 cm below tibial tuberosity). Left leg is erythematous, at the mid-tibia region.

HEENT: No icterus and no jaundice present, head is normocephalic, with normal hair distribuition. No lymphedenopathy present in occipital, periauricular, postauricular, tonsilar, submandibular, subtonsilar, anterior chain, posterior chain, and supraclavicular lymph nodes. Patient can’t hear out of left ear. Both ears have compacted cerumen present. Patient does not wear corrective lenses, and could not see the eye chart to assess visual acuity. His eyes react slower than normal to light, but EOM are bilaterally intact. Patients’ mouth is moist, with a few teeth missing on top and bottom, and no signs of central or peripheral cyanosis. No carotid bruits, no jugular venous distention, and the trachea is midline. The thyroid is non-papable.

Lung: Chest is symmetrical, with diaphragm excursion 6 cm bilaterally. Left lung field breath sides decreased compared to the right lung field. There is also wheezing heard in the right lung field. Right lung field is resonant to percussion, but the left lung field is dull to percussion. Vibrations felt throughout for tactile vocal fremitus. No crackles or rales heard.

Heart: No thrills, murmers, bruits over the carotid, or extra heart sounds heard. Rate and rhythm are regular, and also symmetric at radial, femoral, dorsalis pedis and posterior tibial pulses. S1 and S2 heard in all regions.

Abdomen: Scar preset from a stomach tube that was placed for feeding. Patient doesn’t recall when or why the tube was placed. Chart did not specify why either. No bruits heard over the abdominal aorta, renal, or iliac arteries. Borborygmus present. No tenderness, guarding, or rigidity present. There are bulging flanks and spider nevi present. Liver span is 6 cm. Spleen and kidneys non-papable. i

Extremities: Patient has weak dorsalis pedis and posterior tibial pulses present (1+ bilaterally). Ankles are swollen, there is no pitting edema present.

Musculoskeletal: Lower extremities have normal passive ROM present, but decreased active ROM. Normal passive and active ROM present in upper extremities. Motor strength is decreased in upper(4/5) and lower limbs(3/5).

Nervous System:

Mental Status: Patient is alert and oriented to place and time, but cannot remember events from yesterday. He can remember events from years ago, and is aware that he is forgetful now with memory loss.

Cranial Nerves: Intact, no facial dropping or weakness on either side.

Sensory: Lower extremities showed pain sensation and proprioception intact, but no vibration sense present.

Reflexes: Lower extremity reflexes were not assessed as patient could not move his legs. Upper extremity reflexes intact.

Cerebellar: Babinski intact. Patient could not get out of bed to assess gait.

Laboratory Data: Labs taken Dec. 31, 2010

Glucose elevated 122 (normal 70-105 mg/dL)

BUN/Cr elevated 1.35 (normal 0.7-1.3 mg/dL)

Problem List:

1) Dementia

2) Chest pain

3) Wheezing and Cough

4) Depression

5) Leg/Arm weakness

6) Preventative medicine- routine physical exam, mini mental status exam, psych evaluation, colonoscopy and rectal exam, pneumovax vaccine, influenza shot

Assessment:

Dementia: Dementia is an impairment of cognitive function, affecting memory, attention, language, and/or problem solving. This impairment has to be lasting 6 months or longer. The first sign of dementia is usually short term memory loss, progressing to memory forming impairment, and later an inability to learn new things. Usually the patient is aware of the memory loss. Eventually the memory loss is too great, and there is a loss of personal hygiene, eating, and other activities of daily living. This also affects mood, and there can be fluctuations between happiness, sadness, and anger. There can be sleep disturbances and personality changes. Depression is one of the major illnesses that can present with dementia. Lastly, there is a complete dependence on others, as the patient can no longer take care of themselves, is disorientated, has memory loss, and in many cases, cannot swallow properly.

There are many types of dementia, and once a person has met the requirements to be diagnosed with dementia, the type must be determined. Each type is caused differently, so treatment can vary slightly. The most common type is Alzheimer’s dementia. Patients with Alzheimer’s can be differentiated from other types, as these patients are more likely to get lost in familiar places, try to leave home, have difficulty communicating, and have memory problems. This can occur from tau neurofibrilllary protein tangles in the brain and plaque formation. Also there can be a loss of acetylcholine in the brain. Patients with multi-infarct dementia can be differentiated based on a history of smoking, stroke, atherosclerosis, and hypertension. Multi-infarct dementia occurs from many small strokes affecting the brain. Patients with vascular-type dementia usually have aphasia, apraxia, a difficulty learning math skills, and often present with neglect. This type of dementia occurs due to cerebrovascular disease or stroke. Lewy-Body dementia presents with recurrent visual hallucinations, motor impairments similar to Parkinson’s disease, and varying levels of attention throughout the day. This can occur due to Lewy bodies (abnormal protein) deposits in the brain, and sometimes a loss of dopamine too.

Currently, our patient has been diagnosed with dementia. He meets the criteria for this diagnosis: he has memory loss, is aware of his memory loss, has lost the ability to care for himself, has lost some autonomic function and must wear a diaper, and has been having sleep disturbances. Mr. AS does not recall how he got to the facility, and states that he can’t remember what he did yesterday, but can remember stuff from years ago. He no longer can live alone at home without someone to care for him, and has been living at the facility since April 2009. He also states that he sleeps more than he used to, sleeping now for most of the day. A family member must be contacted to assess the changes that have occurred prior to his admittance to the facility, as our patient is unable to tell us of any changes in his status. We also need to contact his family to narrow down which possible type of dementia the patient has based off of his previous behavior prior to entering the facility. If he was experiencing getting lost in familiar places, it could be Alzheimer’s; he has the risk factors of multi-infarct dementia, especially if he has had more than one stroke; lastly we would need to assess his function before and after the stroke to determine if it was vascular type dementia. He currently has no signs or symptoms of Lewy- body dementia. Our patient is also on medications for Alzheimer’s type of dementia: Mirtazapine, Namenda, Aricept, and Zolpidem tartrate. These medications help relieve some of the symptoms that our patient has, such as depression and sleep disturbances, and can increase the acetylcholine levels in the brain.

Chest Pain: Chest pain can be caused by angina, coronary spasm, MI, pericarditis, gastroesophageal reflux, aortic dissection, and many more causes. Our patient is not currently in any chest pain, but he does have a pace maker. He states he does not know why he was given a pace maker, but states that he has never had any problems or complications with it. A family member needs to be contacted to find out why the pace maker was placed. His chart did not state a reason for the pace maker or state why he was having chest pain. The most common reason for a pace maker is to regulate an arrythymia. An EKG record prior to his placement of his pace maker, can help to determine if an arrhythmia was the reason he had one inserted. A recent EKG will tell us if his heart rate is normal, and if there are any associated pathologies. His medications include: Nifedipine, Metoprolol tartrate, and aspirin, which are all given for chest pain, usually angina and hypertension. He is also taking Omeprazole for GERD.

Wheezing and Cough: The most common cause of wheezing is due to a constriction of the airways. This can be an inflammatory response, such as with asthma. Asthma, however, would also cause shortness of breath, which our patient is currently not experiencing, and would be bilateral (unlike only in one side as with our patient). COPD, emphysema, or a lung tumor could be possible causes for his wheezing and coughing. Smoking is a risk factor for all 3, and our patient has a 160 year pack history. It needs to be determined if his wheezing is occurring in the expiratory phase or the inspiratory phase. During the expiratory phase would indicate bronchial disease, but during the inspiratory phase would indicate a foreign body (such as tumor) or scarring. Wheezing heard in both phases could indicate a collapsed lung or portion of lung. Unilateral wheezing also would be more indicative of a lung tumor. There also are no crackles or rales heard in our patient, so fluid in the lungs or turbulent flow does not seem to be the problem.

Depression: The cause of depression is unknown, but it is known to be caused by chemical imbalances in the brain. It can also be caused from stress, or a life changing event, such as death of a loved one or social isolation. Depression can present with a number of symptoms such as: fatigue, lack of energy, feelings of worthlessness, feelings of hopelessness, anger, discouragement, irritability, changes in appetite, changes in weight, sleep disturbances, and thoughts of death or suicide. Although our patient has had sleep disturbances, a SIGECAPS interview was negative. His sleep disturbances can be due to dementia. Currently our patient is on medication for depression, Mirtazapine, and should remain on it, so that he does not become depressed.

Arms and Leg Weakness: Arm and leg weakness can be caused by a number of things, such as stroke, infectious disease, amputations, and trauma. Our patient suffered a stroke, after which he states he has not been able to use his legs anymore. His legs may be weak, as the nerves may have been damaged from occlusion, and are not able to send complete signals anymore. His arms may be weak from overuse, as he has been learning to use a walker as part of his physical therapy. His arms have to hold up his body now, as his legs can’t.

Preventative Medicine: Our patient needs to have continuous routine physical exams to assess his ever changing status. A mini mental status exam also should be performed to monitor any changes, or the rate of progression of his dementia. A psych evaluation is needed to determine the extent of his depression and if it is getting better from his medication, or if he is having a more positive outlook on life. Our patient is at the age where a routine colonoscopy and rectal exam should be performed to monitor for colon cancer, prostate cancer, and BPH. Currently our patient is on Tamsulosin for BPH, so it is essential to continually monitor him. Additionally, our patient is elderly and should have a pneumovax vaccine and an influenza shot as prevention for illness.

Plan:

In addition to the preventative measures listed, in order to assess the patient fully, we will need to contact his family and inquire about if there were any changes in the patient’s mood, demeanor, physical abilities, and mental status before he was admitted to the facility. His family will also be questioned about their family history of disease, as the patient could not recall how most of his family passed away. To prove our diagnosis, brain scans (CT and MRI) should be performed on the patient and assessed for changes, loss, or infarcts. The patient is also experiencing a constant cough, with a 160 pack year history of smoking so pulmonary function tests should be performed. A chest xray should also be performed to determine if there are any pathological changes within his lungs (such as a tumor) that are causing his wheezing and decreased lung field sounds. This xray can also be used to assess if there have been any cardiovascular changes. Due to the patients past history, he will need to be continually monitored for changes. He will also need a CBC to monitor these changes. The patient also will need to have his medication list continually reassessed (additions or deletions) with changes. Currently he is on medication for allergies or rhinorrhea, but he is not experiencing any symptoms of allergies or rhinorrhea, so Loratadine and his nasal decongestant may be removed.

Psychological Adjustment Following Mastectomy Due To Breast Cancer Nursing Essay

Introduction

Breast cancer is prevalent worldwide (World Health Organization, 2010); is considered the top malignancy among the women (Saraswathi, Suzanna, Ho & Wong 2005). In Singapore, 1 out of 17 women acquires breast cancer, and it has highest incident rate among women aged 50 to 59 (Health Promotion Board, 2010 and Tey & Lee, 2008). Often, the patient and/or the husband undergo major adjustment, in order to conquer the threats of malignancy physically and psychologically. Because of the nature of malignancy and tumour location, mastectomy is usually the recommended treatment (Holly, Kennedy, Taylor & Beedie, 2003). Yet the idea of mastectomy is unwelcomed by many patients, as the removal of the breast means removing an important symbolism of femininity as well (Bredin, 1999). This thus inevitably causes them to suffer from some psychological disturbances due to the change of body image. Consequently, the partner may also be mentally affected due to the responses from the wife (Sandham & Harcourt, 2006). Hence, the process of recovery is made more challenging with the emotional distresses, interfere the patient from returning to the routine lifestyle.

Because of high incidence, this has brought about arguments which highlight the aroused psychological impacts after mastectomy. Therefore, in this paper, I would focus on psychological concerns and reactions of patients with mastectomy, especially those who have undergone radical mastectomy which is the removal of the whole breast, including the surrounding lymph nodes and muscles (Richman & Grose, 2010). Moreover, some reactions encountered by the partners and current interventions which could assist the patients and/or the partner are discussed, thus promoting better psychological adjustment.

Literature Review

Every woman perceives the significance of the breast differently; the loss of breast can result in reactions that vary among them. It is being studied that post-mastectomy patients exhibit high emotional distress (Kornblith & Ligibel, 2003). Significant concerns mentioned include feeling of depressed with their situation due to the breasts being removed, anxiety over cancer recurrence, and embarrassments with the image of incompleteness. Moreover, diminished of sexual functioning is also highlighted in the study. To a certain extent, women claims that sexual enjoyment seems to decline after the operation. Kornblith and Ligibel (2003) explained this phenomenon due to change in the patients’ perception towards themselves. The loss of sexual pleasure also arises because absence of the breast creates insensitivity during intimacy, thus interfering with sexual intercourse. It is commented that patients with breast conserving surgeries done, exhibit lower stress than post-mastectomy patients, but there is no extensive account of figures accompanied.

Similar findings with more detailed explanation by Bredin (1999) also supported that patients often verbalised feeling depressed over the altered figures, and are troubled upon seeing own reflections. Some may even progress to the extent of disliking the look of their bodies, resulting in poor body perceptions. In the article, some also reported the effects of breast loss on social identity. For instance, a lady is fearful of allowing the husband to touch her chest, claiming that she is afraid that the husband might experience a different sensation that he used to experience. Deceased intimacy between the patients and spouses could jeopardise the relationships and induce stress to the husbands, but it is not elaborated in the journal. Avci, Okanli, Karabulutlu & Bilgili (2009), also stated that some husbands are reluctant to touch the operated site, but it does not provide an explanation for the behaviours, partly because the research does not recruit the participation of the husbands. On the contrary, Kornblith and Ligibel (2003) give an account of the problems that the husbands may face. These include dissatisfaction with the relationship after mastectomy and decrease interaction between the couples as the husbands are uncertain about what to say. These behaviours made the wives feel isolated and hopeless; they have difficulties seeking back the pleasant relationships which they used to have. Nonetheless, Sandham’s and Harcourt’s (2006) study of the partners whose wives have had mastectomy, demonstrates that partners play a vital role in prevent maladjustment. Their concerns and supports are not only necessary for the wives to cope with the grief of breast loss, it can provide adaptation for the partners as they may handle the stressors together.

Karabulut and Erci (2009) provide the details that possibility of divorce increases after mastectomy, as the husbands’ attitude and expectation of the wives change, thinking they are less attractive. These eventually results in more maladaptive behaviours of the patients as they can achieve their desired self image, especially if they are young and have physical beauty expectations (Karabulut & Erci, 2009 and Holly et al., 2003). Nonetheless, risk factors of emotional instability are not greatly discussed by the journal.

Crompvoets’s (2005) study aids in the understanding of femininity which women associated with the breast. It is explained that the presence of breasts ties with the femininity and provides sense of physical attractiveness, by sharing some stories of patients. It has been accounted that without breast, women feel “physically handicapped” and feel they have evolved to somebody who seems distant to their usual self (Crompvoet, 2005, p.79). A different in this article is that the effectiveness of breast reconstruction is also explored, and case-studies of the patients who received the treatment are also shared, mentioning regain of femininity which is robbed by mastectomy. Positive feedbacks of reconstruction are identified by them, empowering them for better adjustment and overcome poor body-image.

Findings by Harcourt and Rumsey (2001) have reflected another psychological adaptation is observed in patients during breast reconstruction. Self-esteem is restored and improvement of the perception of disfigurement is achieved with the intervention. Moreover, a comparison result is showed if reconstruction treatment could initiate immediately after mastectomy. However, the authors contradict the use of prosthesis which enables the concealment of operative area, is explained by the Mahon & Casey (2003) as a mean to improve quality of life. They mentioned that wearing prosthesis is inconvenient and serves a reminder for the patients about the traumatising event, thus more patients would prefer surgical reconstruction to prosthesis (Harcourt & Rumsey, 2001).

The literatures provide sufficient discussion on the psychological impacts after mastectomy. Due to the altered body image, various psychological concerns are stimulated, impairing the well-being of the patient, and the relationship with the husband may weakened. Reconstruction interventions are effective in restoring femininity, and are being engaged by many patients.

Discussion

Relevance to nursing practice

The nurse can alley the tension of the couple by providing sufficient information preoperatively, so that they are mentally prepared, thus minimising postoperative stress (Richman & Grose, 2010). Too much information can be overwhelming for patient, thus it is more appropriate to assess and address immediate issues that the couple is concerned. Alternatively, handouts could be provided to allow them to refer when necessary (Morris, 1979). These preparations warrants effective outcome for realistic goals and undertakes a patient-centred approach in delivering care (Denton, 1996). These in turn enhance postoperative care and sharing of thoughts, when the couple is comfortable with the nurse and feel less intimidated if the barrier of formality is removed. In other word, establish rapport with the couples, facilitating explicit discussion so that sufficient assistance is supplied (Harmer, 2004).

During the postoperative period, the nurse may face a dilemma to decide whether the patient should be asked to view wound. According to Denton (1996), assessment of patient allows determination of the psychological aspects. If patient is susceptible to serious emotional distress and is in unstable mood, probably she is not ready to observe the scar. Gradually, encourage patient to view the altered figure through a small mirror before progressing to full-length mirror to avoid sudden emotional breakdown (Denton, 1996). Husband could also be allowed to look at the site, as his presence is believed to be coping measure for patient. At the same time, he may have better control over the situation if he is aware of the wife’s condition and being participating in care (Sandham & Harcourt, 2006).

Opportunity should be created to allow interaction between the couple. By encouraging them to converse, certain issues could be resolved, and fear of uncertainty may also be diminished as misunderstandings or misconceptions are clarified (US National Institute of Health: National Cancer Institute, 1990). As such, educate the husband so that he would not be afraid to touch the wife, worrying that he may hurt her. Though this may be a small gesture, it reassures the wife for the husband’s understanding, so that the wife would not misinterpret the behaviour as a form of rejection. Often, counselling ought to involve both patient and spouse, hence diminishing anxiety through mutual knowledge and cooperation (Sarawathi, Suzanna, Ho & Wong, 2009).

When patients are keen for breast reconstruction, relate the concerns to the team doctors, so that they can refer patient to plastic surgeon, allowing discussion for desired cosmetic outcome (Greifzu, 1986). Alternative measure of prosthesis can also be offered, so that patient is informed of the available measure to improve self image (Mahon & Casey, 2003).

Social support groups have shown to be effective in empowering patient (Skrzypulec, Tobor, Drosdzol & Nowosielski, 2008). Thus introduce available programme to the couple, enhancing sharing of coping strategies and assist one another to overcome the challenges of accepting themselves and establishing functioning role in the family again.

Recommendations for future research

It is mentioned that breast cancer is a “couple’s ordeal” (Sandham & Harcourt, 2006, p.67), it is thus valuable to exploring the couples’ reactions together, rather than just including the patient or the spouse as research subjects. It is believed that this can generate useful results, making help available if problem is identified in the process. This in turn may serves as valuable information for new patients, and enables them to learn from the real examples, hence preventing similar problem from occurring.

Since mastectomy is common in treating breast cancer, it should be an area which is well research on (Skrzypulec et al., 2007). However, in Asia, it can be a challenge to get participates in breast cancer research due to cultural factors which may hinder active involvements (Tan, 2009). Thus, engaging more studies on Asia, especially an urbanised city like Singapore, could establish significant data that are useful in creating awareness and serves as a form of support to current patients by grouping them together.

Conclusion

Being a method that offers higher survival rate, mastectomy imposes mutilating emotions which affects patients’ well being. Due to the sudden loss of femininity, patients are vulnerable to elicit negative reactions in response to the altered image. These emotions inevitably contribute to the stressors that may be encountered by the spouses, eventually result in unpleasant relationships. In order to support them in undergoing such a dreadful period, supports from the multidisciplinary team are important, especially nurses could help in playing an active role. Hence, the nurses’ duties help to facilitate communication between the couples, and also convey concerns to other disciplines, thereby rendering resolutions to improve quality of life.

Effectiveness of Oxygen Therapy for Cardiac Problems

Oxygen therapy is the administration of oxygen at a higher concentration than that of ambientair. The main intention of this process is to either treat or prevent the symptoms and manifestations of hypoxia. Oxygen therapy decreasesthe work of breathing by increasing alveolar oxygen tension. As an essential part of clinical practice, oxygen therapy is widely used in cardiac care. Despite all thiswide uses of this therapy have been criticalin cardiac care. Studies have provedthat excessive use of oxygen, results incritical conditionsinthe areas that it is applied. This essay aims at examining the concentration required, different conditions, where it could be needed and the effects of use of high concentration oxygen for the client with chest pain.

When there is airway obstruction as a result of cardiac effects such as asthma, pneumonia, breathing system of the client becomes complicated. This client can only breathewhen the oxygen level climbs above a setlevel. This will maintain functional ability and at the same time minimize the chest pain, which may have been caused by breathing problem. It is very important to note that there are several causes or condition that may arise to chest pain(Fritz&Faber, 2012). The different approachesproposed, suggestthat these statementsandsolutions do not conform withthe available evidence in the cardiac care. Also, inthe treatmentof a patient with cardiacproblems, the main issueto be consideredis the balance ofevidence for both the safety andefficiency of oxygen administrationin cardiac care.

Arterial oxygen tension is one of thesigns todeterminant coronary artery tone. Slightincrementin arterial oxygen reducescoronary flow irrespective of priorsaturation(Atar, 2010). The human study of patientswith cardiac problems hyperoxia from concentrated oxygentherapy reducescoronary blood flow(Atar, 2010). Administering oxygen therapyto patients with myocardial infarction, oxygen therapy canreduce cardiac outputvolumes, and blood pressure and vascular resistance(Atar, 2010). Thereevidencein determiningsafety and efficiency ofoxygenadministration in cardiac care. The evidence supportsuseofoxygentherapyin minormyocardial infection resultsinincreaseddeath rates tothe patients.

Research has approved that resuscitation from cardiac arrest; administration of high oxygenresults in hypoxia. Thisis directly associatedwith more deaths to patients incomparison to either normoxia or hypoxiaproblems. Continuoususe of oxygen therapy in cardiac careis harmful to the patient of cardiac problem and this approach is not the best. It is recommended that, the administration of oxygentherapyshould be at the level of 96% to keepstandardizedsaturation(Bersten&Soni, 2009). Also, oxygen needbe administeredfordefinitecardiac cares, in which benefit of oxygen therapyoutweighs the risks it may impose to the patient. Healthcare professionals should take into account that the method, doseand delivery periodis clearly speltand patient’s reaction to oxygenadministration is thoroughly monitored (Fritz&Faber, 2012).

Since oxygen is a drug, its administration requires a medical order. Each of the episodes of oxygen delivery should be ordered on the medicationchart either as on-going or one-off treatment. There are some conditionsthat should be examined before the nurse initiatesoxygen. First, the nurse should realize that the patient hasbreached expected normal parameter of oxygen saturation, also a medical review is required within thirty minutesand then at the time of the medical review, the right prescription of oxygen should be written. Before the selection of the delivery method, caregiversshould check at the individual flow meter for where to read the ball when setting the flow rate (Straface et al. , 2008). Some of the flow metersmay register greater than the maximum flow indicated in the meter in the case of the ball being set above the highest amount(Hunt, 1999). The nurse is required to use caution when adjusting the flow meter. All of the high concentration or delivery requires humidification. The selection ofthehumidification will depend on the oxygen delivery system in use. It should be noted that, air entrainment devices are not effective when it comes to delivering FiO2that is greater than 50%. Administration of high concentration of oxygen to clients with chest pain may worsen the pain, when breathing elevated pressure of oxygen is extended for a longer period(Myers et. al. , 2008).

There has been a growing debate and concern on the administration of high oxygen concentration to those clients with chestpain(Frey&Shann, 2003). Traditionally, for over a decade, patients who complained of chest pain were instantly administered high flow of oxygen, this process initially started when medics realized that oxygen would ease myocardial ischaemia in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Also, highoxygen concentrationmay cause atelectasis. The alveolirelies onnitrogen topreservesurfactantcreationand alveolarpower. The high concentrationof oxygen, when administered may wash out nitrogen and leave the alveoli susceptible to a lack of gas asthegas diffuses to blood(Shekhar et. al. , 2010).

It is important to note that; high oxygen concentration to thosepatients with cardiac problems, do not yield much advantage. Thispractice quickly became a routine in patients presenting with acute chestpain(Robyn and Coffee, 2012). Recently there has been a report indicating that harmful effects of high flow of oxygen in ACS patients where the patient may not be hypoxic. High flow of oxygen has previously been associated witha reductionof cardiac output, attribute to arterial vasoconstriction and also it increases systemic vascular resistance. Inmorerecent evidence, systematic review shows that the routine use of high concentration on chest painmay lead to greater infarct size increasing the risks of mortality.

From a physiological perspective, treatment of ACS’ patientswith oxygen seems reasonable. For apatient suffering from ACS, there isalack of myocardial perfusionsand less oxygenation of the myocardium. In thiscontext, itseems logical to increase the oxygenation of the blood. Thistreatment is not well thought and can lead topatient harm, if not well monitored. The bottom line is that, the drug that is often usedcan cause harm if it is given without a good reason, when there isless saturationof oxygenin apatient’s blood, oxygen cannot help them with shortness of breath, and it may hurt them instead. The same idea holds truefor the neonates and any ofpatients with ongoing tissue injury from MI, stroke or trauma it is true that oxygen can be badwhen not wellmonitoredin administration (Myers et. Al. , 2008).

The hemodynamic effect of high flow of oxygen in the myocardial was explored bygroups to improve on the cardiac care. The cardiovascular response to high concentration of oxygen was primarily attributed to arterial vasoconstriction; this has been demonstrated in retinal blood vessels. This method was also thought to be the reason behind the reduction in renal blood flowofcerebral blood flowwith oxygen therapy. Research has demonstrated that high concentrationof oxygen cannot increase itstransport inpatients with arterial oxygen saturation to a level of less than 90%. This is explainedbythe notionthat the reduction in cardiacoutput in excess leads toincreases in oxygen content. In patients with arterial oxygen saturation of less of 90%, this shows that oxygen administration increased oxygen transportation(Campbell&Silver, 1998). This is due to both increased cardiac output and oxygen content. In therecent years, researchers have providedclearand direct evidence that the administration of high flow oxygen reduces coronaryartery blood flowfor the stable patient with ischaemic heart effect. This evidence wasprovided over a decade ago, and this has been confirmedthe method of high oxygen concentration may change, but the effects of oxygen on the cardiac care remainthe same.

In conclusion, it is important to note that it is not clear whether routine administration of oxygen in patients’ with cardiac problemsin relation to chest pain has all the positive impacts on the outcome(Hunt, 1999). This systematic review challenges the status quo predicted by the international guidelines on the treatment of the chest pain caused by cardiac problems. The argument of reduced mortality due to administration of concentrated oxygen topatients with cardiac problem is disturbing. There is no need to administer a method of treatment on a patient in which the negative impacts outweighs the gain. The different approaches in tackling this major problemofchest paingives a clear evidence and explanationofthe conditions in which a patient is to be administered with concentrated oxygen. Before any treatment is done forpatientswith chest pain, caregiversshould try to understand the cause of the pain(Campbell&Silver, 1998). For example, the pleuritic pain is triggeredby chest movement and it is severe during coughing. Splinting the chest wall will help in reducing the discomfort of coughing. Cardiac care is involved with a lot of approaches that need to be looked at before treatment is undertaken.

References

Frey, B. , & Shann, F. (2003). Oxygen administration in infants. Archives of Disease 2in Childhood – Fetal and Neonatal Edition, 88, F84 – F88.

Bersten, A. & Soni, N. (Eds). (2009). Oh’s Intensive Care Manual 6th Edition. China: Butterworth Heinemann Elsevier

Campbell, E. ; Baker, D. , & Crites-Silver, P. (1998)” Subjective Effects of Humidification of oxygen for delivery by nasal cannula” ChestVol 93: 2 289 – 293

Shekhar, R. , N. Garg, A. Chockalingam, A. Tharakan, and A. Senthilkumar. (2010)”A Young Adult With Atypical Chest Pain. “

Chest

138. 4 MeetingAbstracts: 95A-95A. Print

Beyar, R. (2009)”Acute Cardiac Care-From Symptoms to Diagnosis and to Interventions. ”

Acute cardiac care

11. 3: 129-130. Print.

Clark, R. A. , &Neil, C. (2012):”Can the Cardiac ARIA Index Improve Cardiac Care for Australia’s Indigenous Population?. “

Journal of Cardiac Failure

18. 8:S89-S90. Print.

Hunt, J. m. (1999):”Cardiac sugical patients’ expectations and experiences of nursing care in the intensive care unit. “

Australian Critical care

12. 2:79. Print.

Fritz, A. , & Faber, P. (2012). Chronic cardiac chest pain.

Continuing Education in Anaesthesia,


Critical Care & Pain

,

12

(6), 302-306.

Straface, A. L. , Myers, J. H. , Kirchick, H. J. , & Blick, K. E. (2008). A Rapid Point-of-Care Cardiac Marker Testing Strategy Facilitates the Rapid Diagnosis and Management of Chest Pain Patients in the Emergency Department.

American journal of clinical


pathology

,

129

(5), 788-795.

Atar D. (2010)Should oxygen be given inmyocardial infarction? BMJ; 340: c3287.

Success Rates of Dental Implant in Patients with Parkinsons Disease

D3 Case Report

Patient JS

Table of Contents

  1. Introduction of Clinical Question
    1. Background
    2. Significance
    3. Purpose
    4. Patient’s Presentation of Condition or Risk
  2. Literature Review
    1. PICO
    2. Clinical Question
    3. Search Strategy
    4. Article Analysis
    5. Synthesis of the Findings
  3. Description of the Patient
    1. Demographics
    2. Social, Personal and Family History Including Risk Factors
    3. Review of Medical History
    4. Results of a Physical Exam Including Vital Signs
    5. Ethical Dilemma
  4. Discussion of Positive Findings
  5. Conclusions and Recommendation

 

 


Introduction of Clinical Question


Background

Parkinson’s Disease is one of the most common conditions that present with orofacial dystonia and dyskinesia (Packer, M. E. 2018).

This leads to patients with the disease having trouble performing everyday activities such as eating, speaking and maintaining oral hygiene (Heckmann, S. M., Heckmann, J. G. and Weber, H. 2000). Parkinson’s Disease is more often seen in men than women and affects every 120 out of 100,000 people. There are two modes of this disease. The first is a genetic form which only consists of 5% of people with Parkinson’s and occurs at a young age. The second occurs around the age of 57 and is deemed idiopathic as it has a more complex etiology where there is a familial and environmental component (Bollero, et al., 2017). Secondary Parkinsonism can be drug-induced. Parkinson’s disease is caused by the death of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra and locus coruleus. It is caused by the presence of Lewy bodies in the nerve cells in areas as such (Drummond, Newton, & Yemm, 1995).

These neurons, which are subsequently destroyed, are necessary for the control of movement and coordination. Patients begin to experience symptoms once there is about a 65% reduction in functioning dopaminergic neurons (Bollero, et al., 2017).

The symptoms are categorized into non-motor, motor and behavioral. The cardinal motor symptoms, which are the most overt, include tremors, bradykinesia, akinesia, and postural instability. Tremors are typically present at limbs as well as most orofacial muscles. Bradykinesia explains slow movement while akinesia is the impairment of voluntary movement. Postural instability is a major component of the appearance of Parkinson’s Disease. This is where the patient has difficulty with balance and walks with their trunk and head more forward. Non-motor symptoms include, autonomic nervous system dysfunction, insomnia and olfactory dysfunction. Behavioral symptoms include depression, dementia and psychosis (Bollero, et al., 2017).

The main treatment of Parkinson’s disease is levodopa with peripheral dopa-decarboxylase inhibitor. Despite being widely used, one in six patients fail to respond to Levodopa and those who respond to it lose the response after about four years. Because of this, it is mainly used once symptoms are shown to be significantly debilitating. A selective MAOB-inhibitor, Selegiline, inhibits the degradation of dopamine in the central nervous system. Selegiline can be used to treat Parkinson’s disease in its early stages due to the fact that it delays the progression of the disease and its levodopa-sparing effects (Drummond, Newton, & Yemm, 1995).


Significance

All of these symptoms make it more difficult for patients to practice proper oral hygiene. Patients with Parkinson’s Disease have difficulty brushing their teeth, chewing, swallowing, along with many more essential aspects of maintaining oral health. Due to their motor and behavioral symptoms, they tend to make fewer visits to the dentist. As their akinesia affects the jaw, their chewing ability is compromised and therefore this leads to retention of food (Bollero, et al., 2017).

The standard treatment for the symptoms of Parkinson’s Disease is Levodopa and other dopamine agonists. Anticholinergic drugs are also used and can cause side effects such as gingival hyperplasia, bruxism and xerostomia. These side effects make patients with Parkinson’s Disease more susceptible to dental fractures and carious lesions. Pharmacologic management of symptoms could provide therapy for the first 5-10 years of use. There is an increase in symptoms after long-term pharmacological use. Recently there has been an alternative treatment called deep brain stimulation surgery which allows for relief of symptoms and a decrease of medication use (Liu, Su, You, & Wu, 2015).


Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to compare the success rate of dental implant in patients with Parkinson’s Disease with the general population. Parkinson’s disease reduces the patient’s ability to perform proper oral hygiene. Along with poor oral hygiene, these patients have tremors that affect their oral cavity as well as reduced ability to chew and perform normal orofacial movements. It is important to know the proper treatment for patients in this situation and whether dental implants is a recommended treatment as opposed to alternative prostheses and treatments.


Patient’s Presentation of Condition or Risk

Patient JS presented to NYU Dental’s 1A clinic for comprehensive care on July 13

th

with a chief complaint; “I want a full check-up and cleaning.” The patient was seen in clinic 5AB-A where a comprehensive examination and treatment plan were rendered. After proper examination, it was determined that the patient needed an extraction on tooth #20 due to the extensive carious lesion. Tooth #15 had an existing crown that has open margins and therefore it was determined that it would need to be re-done. After being given the option, the patient requested to receive an implant supported crown to replace the tooth. Teeth #8, #9 and #10 required restorations on the MI surfaces. Patient JS presented with severe plaque and halitosis which corresponds to his lack of manual dexterity and ability to take care of his oral hygiene. After assessing the patient’s tremors and areas of contact on those teeth, it was determined that the restorations would not last and it would be best to try to arrest the demineralization at each visit.

Patient JS presented with Parkinson’s disease at a moderate severity. The patient had noticeable tremors and anxiety about his oral health. He elaborated having limitations such as not being able to use his dominant left hand for writing anymore. He also mentioned that he has mild anxiety. The patient is taking medications, Amantadine, Selegiline and Pramipexole, to help treat his symptoms for Parkinson’s disease.


Literature Review


PICO

Population: Patients with dental implants

Intervention: Parkinson’s Disease

Comparison: Patients without Parkinson’s Disease

Outcomes: Dental implant success


Clinical Question:

In patients seeking dental implants, does having Parkinson’s Disease lower the success rate than the general population?


Search Strategy:

The initial search in PubMed began as “Parkinson’s Disease AND dental implant*” My search presented 13 articles. I conducted another search of “Parkinson’s Disease AND dental implant* OR Parkinson’s AND dental implant*” which presented the same 13 articles. I found five of the articles useful for this paper, two of which did not have the full text available. Two of the articles are systematic reviews and the other is a clinical report.


Article Analysis:

1)

“A review of the outcome of dental implant provision in individuals with movement disorders.”

Mark Edward Packer. 2018.

This article was chosen as it is a systematic review that discusses the survival of dental implants in patients with movement disorders such as Parkinson’s Disease that patient JS exhibits. The purpose of this paper was to “establish whether implant success in patients suffering from movement disorders is similar to the general population, identifying risk factors and noting recommendations that may aid maintenance programmes” (Packer. 2018. 1). This search primarily yielded patient case reports. Other studies rendered were patient case series observational studies.

In the patient case reports, the ages of the participants from the studies ranged from 19-83 years old. Most of the implants were placed using a two-stage-process or delayed loading and were followed up for two years or less. During the observational period, the majority of reports showed a 100% survival rate. Cobalt-Chromium strengthen design was the main material selected across the articles for the implants. All early failures were due to integration as opposed to mechanical failures.

In the observational studies, the ages of the participants from the studies ranged from 12-834, similar to that of the patient case reports. Parkinson’s Disease studies generally treated an older age group of  54-81 years old. Most of the implants were placed using a two-stage-process. The studies following patients with Parkinson’s Disease, implant survival rates of 77%-86% were reported. Most studied followed up with patients for at least four years. The majority of implant failures were reported in the early stages although in patients with Parkinson’s Disease, later failures were noted.

This paper discussed the outcome of dental implants placed in patients with movement disorders compared to in the general population. One study reviewed in the paper concluded a 91% implant survival rate after four years in the patients with movement disorders, compared to a 100% survival rate in the control group. In patients with Parkinson’s Disease, it is suggested to provide IV-sedation, midazolam can be beneficial to reduce the risk of cardiovascular issues from the catecholamines. The early implant failures noted in some patients with the disease could have been due to a lack of elimination of motor symptoms. In one study with patients with Parkinson’s disease, from the nine subjects, there was an 82% success rate of the implants whereas another study including three subjects presented a 100% success rate. In the study with nine subjects, there was another follow-up after five years showing late implant failure in four of the patients. This is most likely linked to their parafunctional symptoms leading to implant fracture. It is suggested to add an additional “sleeper” implant when placing a two implant mandibular overdenture. This will stabilize the denture.

There were three studies reviewed in this paper that dealt specifically with patients with Parkinson’s Disease. I was concluded that the quality of life for these patients were improved with the addition of dental implants to support a fixed prosthesis or an overdenture. This allowed them to have improved chewing, moderate body weight gain and improved GI symptoms as well as overall oral well-being. Implant supported prosthesis should be considered as first line treatment as it has the best overall prognosis as the disease advances. It is important to take into consideration their inability to maintain proper oral hygiene, however it cannot be concluded that a lack of oral care will cause more issues in patients with Parkinson’s Disease or any movement disorder as opposed to the general population of patients with no movement disorder.

This paper is at the top of the hierarchy of evidence as it is a systematic review. The review only included published studies and English language studies. A strength of this review is that it presented articles with control groups. Another strength was that many movement disorders were assessed and compared to one another to further gain a better understanding for the differences of each and the success of dental implants for each disorder. Regarding the weaknesses, it was not clear how many assessors took part in the analysis and organization of the study. No quantitative analyses were conducted to show the statistical significance of the articles.



2):

“Oral Health and Implant Therapy in Parkinson’s Patients: Review.”

Bollero et al., 2017.

The purpose of this review was to review the oral health of patients with Parkinson’s Disease and factors such as caries and periodontal disease, as well as, dental implants, compared to the general population. The researches made a search of Medline consisting of the keywords: “Parkinson’s Disease and dental management.” The search resulted in 50 articles, 15 of which were used since they dealt with dental implants as well. Articles considered in this review had to have been published from 2000 and on. Most of the articles found DMFT and Periodontal disease to be greater in patients with Parkinson’s disease than the general population. Generally DMFT is greater in the patients, however, two studies in the review showed a lower DMFT in patients with Pakrkinson’s disease. This was thought to be due to the hypersalivation that these patients experience. In order to help these patients with their oral hygiene, it was proposed to see patients in the morning in a 45 degree armchair to prevent extra loss of saliva and help with swallowing. The medications cause xerostomia and subsequently burning mouth syndrome in about 55% of cases. The studies showed that patients with Parkinson’s disease have worse oral health than the general population and have higher risk of caries and periodontal disease.

One article from the review showed that the implant survival rate in patients with Parkinson’s disease, after 12 months, for the maxilla was 85% and for the mandible was 81% compared to 90% in patients without Parkinson’s Disease. In cases with dental implants, patients reported better chewing ability and better quality of life. It is recommended to provide dental implants for these patients in earlier in the disease if possible.

Progression of the disease increases caries and periodontal disease risk. This is due to lack of proper oral hygiene, xerostomia, and a great presence of streptococcus mutans bacteria in the oral cavity. Stannous fluoride toothpaste and an electric toothbrush is recommended to help with oral hygiene. Due to difficulty chewing, many patients have gastrointestinal issues and this review shows that mobile prosthesis  improves these symptoms. Implant therapy to support the mobile prosthesis is favorable to allow for better retainment. Although the implant survival rate is lower in patients with Parkinson’s disease when compared to the general population, it is still a great therapy for these patients due to the benefits it provides.

This is a systematic review and therefore is at the top the hierarchy pyramid. This review has a few strengths, one of which is the fact that the articles reviewed had control groups. A strength of this paper is that it included oral hygiene and DMFT as well as dental implant success. This was interesting to see how each category relates to one another since Parkinson’s disease affects patient’s ability to maintain oral hygiene. The articles also had a large number of subjects per group which allows for greater accuracy in the results. Some shortcomings in the article were that there was no scoring system mentioned nor was there any heterogeneity tests to compare the results of the articles. Quantitative results were not conducted to assess the statistical significance of the results.

3) “

Critical appraisal of evidence supporting the placement of dental implants in patients with neurodegenerative disease”

Faggion. 2017.

The objective of this study was assess the available studies on the effectiveness and difficulty when using dental implants in patients with neurodegenerative diseases. Studies on dental treatment with implants in patients with neurodegenerative diseases were included. Randomized controlled trials and other controlled trials were used in this systematic review. Studies of lower hierarchy were included in the incident that there would not be enough high hierarchic studies found. The lower hierarchy studies that were included were retrospective and prospective cohorts, case series, and clinical reports. “Neurodegenerative diseases were defined as ‘hereditary and sporadic conditions characterized by progressive nervous system dysfunction” (Faggion, C. M. 2016. 2). The neurodegenerative diseases covered in this review are Dementia, Parkinson’s and Huntington’s disease. The databases searched for the articles were PubMed, EMBASE, Biosis Citation Index, CINAHL, Web of Science and LILACS. The search did not have a language restriction. The studies that were included were categorized by the type of study. A risk of bias tool was used for randomized control trials to assess the risk of bias. The methodological quality of the articles were assessed whenever applicable. In the end, 11 papers were included in the review, compared to 58 which were initially chosen.

Outcomes with dental implants in patients with Parkinson’s disease were assessed. Three case reports discussed the process of using mandibular overdentures for an elderly patient. In one of these reports, a 12 year follow up was conducted where the patient expressed his satisfaction with the overdenture. In another article, a patient with moderate Parkinson’s disease received an implant which was reported as successful. In another clinical case, a patient aspirated the dental implant screwdriver during the implant placement. One case series involved patients with severe Parkinson’s disease. These patients received mandibular over dentures and after a year and a half follow up, they reported a great increase in chewing function. Some issues that these patients faced were maintaining their oral hygiene. They experienced gingival hyperplasia under their overdentures. Other reports included concerned patients with Huntington’s disease as well as Dementia. Overall Their quality of life was improved with the addition of dental implants.

Due to the fact that no randomized control trials were found, the findings were less than expected. They show low evidence for the use or disuse of dental implants in these patients. Most of the papers dealt with patients living with Parkinson’s disease. The added dental implants greatly improved their chewing capabilities and quality of life. Contrary to popular belief, many of the patients from these studies presented with better gingival index scores after the insertion of the dental implants.

This review had many strengths due to the fact that it was done in a more precise manner. Risk of bias was prevented with the risk of bias tool. Many online databases were searched which shows a wide array of studies taken into account. This is a systematic review which is at the top of the hierarchy pyramid. There were no quantitative results to show any statistical significance.


Synthesis of the Findings

Overall, these articles present that dental implants are indicated in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Dental implants provide the structural support for these patients to enhance their ability to chew. The articles used in the systematic reviews generally showed positive results in the use of dental implants for patients with Parkinson’s disease. Although the survival of implants may be slightly less in these patients, the benefits are too great to oversee. Generally, oral hygiene was a main issue in the patient’s overall dentition but did not seem to affect the dental implant survival as much as expected. Between the three articles, it was agreed upon that these patients need continuous dental care and assistance with their oral hygiene in order to help increase their quality of life. There are a few recommendations for future research on the topic that would greatly benefit the answer to the clinical questions. Researches would focus more on randomized control trials in order to properly asses the oral health after implant placement. There should be further recommendation on how to assist patients suffering with Parkinson’s disease on ways to maintain oral hygiene.


Description of the patient


Demographics

Age: 57

Sex: Male

Race: Caucasian

Marital status: Married

Language: English


Social, Personal and Family History Including Risk Factors

Patient JS presented to clinic 5AB-A at 10:30 am on June 28

th

20018. At our first appointment his chief complaint was that he wanted a “complete examination and cleaning.” He had some anxiety about past dental work and did not trust what his previous dentist had told him. He expressed that it had been difficult for him to floss. He brushes twice a day but it is difficult for him to reach his posterior teeth and some other areas while brushing his teeth. Patient JS was concerned about his dental health and wanted to make sure he keeps his natural teeth if possible. Due to his disease he clenches and bruxes his teeth. He had a recent life stressor of losing his job. His family history includes his paternal grandfather having had diabetes, his mother and father both had cancer as well as his maternal grandfather. His paternal grandfather had high blood pressure.


Review of the Medical History

Patient JS takes three medications; Amantadine HCl Dose: 100mg TID, Selegiline HCl Dose: 5mg BID and Pramipexole Dose: 3.0g 4 TS D. Patient has Parkinson’s disease. At the most recent visit, he presented with swollen ankles and when asked if he has seen his primary care physician about it he said that he had and she did not recommend any treatment. Due to the disease, he experiences difficulty with balance , tremors, muscle weakness, and limited range of motion. Patient JS also has frequent abdominal pain. Amantadine is an anti-Parkinson agent and Dopamine agonist. Key adverse effects are related to xerostomia and orthostatic hypotension. Selegiline is another anti-Parkinson agent and MAO Type B inhibitor.  If it is taken in doses of 10mg a day or less than it does not require any vasoconstriction precautions. Key adverse effects include xerostomia and dysphagia. Pramipexole is an anti-Parkinson agent and dopamine agonist. Key adverse events include xerostomia (Lexicomp. 2019).              .


Results of a physical exam including vital signs

The patient’s extra-oral examination was within normal limits. Intra-oral findings included halitosis, dental erosion and attrition and mandibular lingual tori. Vitals at the initial visit were 140/87 and pulse was 70 bpm. The patient was visibly anxious which added to his blood pressure. At the next visits his blood pressure was 116/84 and 117/80 with a common pulse of 75 bpm.


Ethical Dilemma

During the oral examination, dental decay was detected on teeth #8, #9 and #10 on the MI surfaces. After hearing this the patient wanted to get them restored. After diagnostic casts were taken and hand articulated, it was determined that these restorations, if done, would fail due to the anterior incisal contact. Not only did they contact at the area where the restoration would be, but the patient experiences orofacial tremors that would cause the restoration to fracture. Because of this I did not feel that it was ethical to proceed with treatment planning the restorations. Therefore, I told the patient that I would be able to apply fluoride varnish to the lesions, which were not extensive yet, and try to arrest the process.


Discussion of Positive Findings

Patient JS presented with extensive decay on tooth #20 and heavy generalized plaque. An extraction of tooth #20 was treatment planned and complete in the periodontal clinic. An implant and implant supported crown has also been treatment planned and will be done in the periodontal clinic as well. Tooth #15 was also treatment planned for a replacement of the crown due to open margins.


Conclusions and Recommendations

The purpose of this case report is to assess the literature in order to properly answer the clinical question: “In patients seeking dental implants, does having Parkinson’s Disease lower the success rate than the general population?” After reviewing the articles it can be concluded that the success rate may be slightly lower in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Regardless of the lower success rate, there are more benefits than not which indicate that, when creating a dental prosthesis, dental implants should be the first line of choice for patients with Parkinson’s disease.

Regarding the treatment for this patient, phase 1 is OHI, phase 2 is adult prophylaxis, extraction of tooth #20 and fluoride varnish application, phase 3 is implant placement on #20, phase 4 is implant supported crown on #20 and the crown on tooth #15, and phase 5 is maintenance and re-care. After having a discussion with the patient we decided that it is best to have him come in for cleanings every three months as his risk is high and cannot maintain his oral hygiene.


References

  • Bollero, P., Franco, R., Cecchetti, C., Miranda, M., Barlattani, A., Jr., Dolci, A., & Ottria, L. (2017). Oral Health And Implant Therapy In Parkinson’s Patients: Review.

    Oral & Implantology,


    10

    (2), 105-111. doi:10.11138/orl/2017.10.2.105
  • Drummond, J. R., Newton, J. P., & Yemm, R. (1995).

    Color atlas and text of dental care of the elderly

    . Retrieved from

    https://bookshelf.vitalsource.com/#/books/0-8151-9751-9/cfi/6/2!/4/10/22/2@0:0
  • Faggion, C. M. (2016). Critical appraisal of evidence supporting the placement of dental implants in patients with neurodegenerative diseases.

    Gerodontology

    ,

    33

    (1), 2–10.

    https://doi-org.proxy.library.nyu.edu/10.1111/ger.12100
  • Heckmann, S. M., Heckmann, J. G. and Weber, H. (2000), Clinical outcomes of three Parkinson’s disease patients treated with mandibular implant overdentures. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 11: 566-571. doi:


    10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011006566.x

  • Lexicomp. 2019. Retrieved from https://online.lexi.com/lco/action/home
  • Liu, F., Su, W., You, C., & Wu, A. Y. (2015). All-on-4 concept implantation for mandibular rehabilitation of an edentulous patient with Parkinson disease: A clinical report.

    The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry,


    114

    (6), 745-750. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.07.007
  • Packer, M. E. (2018). A review of the outcome of dental implant provision in individuals with movement disorders.

    European Journal of Oral Implantology

    ,

    11

    , S47–S63. Retrieved from

    http://proxy.library.nyu.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ddh&AN=131347945&site=ehost-live

Gender Differences in Nursing

Gender Differences in Nursing

Introduction

For a long time, nursing has been associated with the female gender. The first nurses were women, and the trend has continued for years without substantial change. The profession grew from a point of care provision to a recognized profession and the roles changed. Though it has been proved that the satisfaction of the patient is not related to the gender of the nurse, still there are findings that illustrate support the argument[1]. This paper seeks to show why the profession has been dominated by women and why there are low men recording especially in the US and Canada.

Gender differences in nursing

The issue of gender in the nursing profession within Canada and the US needs to be examined. Some studies have suggested that the patient satisfaction in some instances has a very slight link with the nurse’s gender. The career patterns between male and female nurses have been very distinct before, but the two have a shared link now. Women in their career patterns are said to take up lateral moves. On the contrary, men make linear career moves. This means that a woman is likely to spend much time in one career compared to a man. For instance, a female nurse will spend much time in the nursing before training for another post. This is commonly known as the certificate gathered syndrome which mostly affects women[2]. On the contrary, men are taking up the linear career whereby they consider a career in which flexibility is fostered. Men are not grossly affected by the certificate gathered syndrome like women[3].

In the nursing context, the option for nurses to stick to the nursing career is based on many factors. The dominance of females has not been willful, but inevitable. There are findings which suggest that female nurses have certificate gatherer syndrome. This is because the dynamics of the labor markets affect women and men differently. The study of both literal and linear career paths show that the issue of minority men in nursing is due to the structural labor markets that favor men than women. The most stated reason for the differences in the population of men and women in nursing career is the children career breaks that are experienced by both men and women. The period taken by women and men to attain nursing status is distinct[4].

The labor markets in the United States and Canada present a dilemma to men in relation to choosing nursing profession as a career. The nursing labor division is characterized by unqualified persons, and the payment for the unskilled has been exceedingly low. Nursing in the United States has been considered a career for the less skilled individuals. Therefore, many men than women find it hard to advance in nursing. With the minimal hopes of advancement, few men have reluctantly joined nursing. The under-representation of men in the nursing career within the US and Canada illustrates an imbalance that should be addressed. There are prevailing stereotypes about nursing. This cannot be ruled out since it has an influence on the Canadian and United States men on their choice of career. The nursing career has continuously been associated with caring and submission. Large numbers of men think that these traits are for women. In addition, the notion that joining the profession will make them look unmanly has made it hard for men to take up the nursing career[5].

There are notions in the United States and Canadian society’s that perceive men as strong and aggressive. The foregoing statement shows that nursing is not in conformity with the society’s expectations. In a society whereby people are used to nursing being a woman’s job, it increasingly becomes hard for a man to get the society’s approval after becoming a nurse. The said stereotypes may appear trivial, but they have played an influencing effect on the choices that men make regarding their careers. In the reasoning of many men, it is unwise to choose a career with negative perceptions whereas there are other options. Approximately, over 94 per cent of nurses in the US, as well as Canada are female[6]. The overwhelming perception that nurses are poorly paid has not helped in making nursing profession attractive to men. The notion is also evident in children’s understanding of the term. They believe that a man cannot be a nurse. This is passed from one generation to another hence making men shun nursing completely.

Conclusion

The foregoing literature shows that the nursing profession has been widely considered as a women career. There are stereotypes that have made it hard to have men joining this profession. The stereotypes evident have continuously reduced the number of men joining the career. The Canadian and American nursing field is highly dominated by women due to the factors discussed above. The negative stereotypes need to be address if the number of men joining the career is expected to go high.

Bibliography

Andrews, Margaret M., and Joyceen S. Boyle. Transcultural Concepts in Nursing Care. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2008.

Mackay, Lesley. Nursing a Problem Open. Milton Keynes: University Press, 1989.

Radcliffe, Phillip. Gender differences in career progress in nursing: towards a non essentialist theory. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 30, 3 (1996): 758-768.

Spillerman, Seymour. Careers, labor market structure, and socioeconomic

Achievement. American Journal of Sociology 83: (1977): 551-593.

[1] Lesley Mackay, Nursing a Problem Open. (Milton Keynes: University Press, 1989), p. 15

[2] Phillip Radcliffe, Gender differences in career progress in nursing: towards a non essentialist theory. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 30, 3 (1996), p. 762.

[3] Ibid, p 765.

[4] Lesley Mackay, Nursing a Problem Open. (Milton Keynes: University Press, 1989), p.19

[5] Seymour Spillerman, Careers, labor market structure, and socioeconomic Achievement. American Journal of Sociology 83: (1977), p. 572.

[6] Margaret M, Andrews and Joyceen S. Boyle, Transcultural Concepts in Nursing Care. (Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2008), p. 315.

Bring to mind a HIT project implemented in your organization. Which leaders identified the project? Which stakeholders and decision makers helped moved the project forward? Consider methods that were used to garner the support of stakeholders and decision makers to move the project forward.

Bring to mind a HIT project implemented in your organization. Which leaders identified the project? Which stakeholders and decision makers helped moved the project forward?
Consider methods that were used to garner the support of stakeholders and decision makers to move the project forward.

 

A nurse leader sought to implement greater security in the children’s wing of the hospital by installing a new alarm and monitoring system. Due to budget constraints, the CNO rejected the proposal, stating that current security methods were sufficient. Shortly after this failed proposal, an individual did in fact breach the children’s wing security and abducted a young child. Thankfully, the child was found and returned to her parents; and the CNO quickly found the money to install the new security system.

Not all HIT projects have such high-profile stakes. The main takeaway from this example is the importance of getting key stakeholders and decision makers on board when planning a new HIT project.

Bring to mind a HIT project implemented in your organization. Which leaders identified the project? Which stakeholders and decision makers helped moved the project forward?
Consider methods that were used to garner the support of stakeholders and decision makers to move the project forward.
TITLE: HIT Projects and Decision Makers – 1 page APA 6th Edition 2 references
1. Describe an example of a HIT project implemented at your organization and analyze how that project was identified and moved forward.
2. Evaluate the impact of key decision makers on moving the HIT project forward.
“Whatever, in connection with my professional service, or not in connection with it, I see or hear, in the life of men, which ought not to be spoken of abroad, I will not divulge, as reckoning that all such should be kept secret.”
—Confidentiality excerpt from the Hippocratic Oath (as cited in Croll, 2010)
Traditional schools of medicine have a ritual of reciting oath excerpts such as the one above during their graduation ceremonies. Such excerpts usually revolve around a professional’s promise to uphold the ideals of patient safety and confidentiality to the best of his or her ability.
With the continued integration of HIT, and advances in technology such as hand-held computers, new ethical considerations have evolved within health care settings. For example, wireless capabilities can provide easier access to information from unauthorized outside parties. While technological advances have led to improvements in health care, they have also created new vulnerabilities. DNP-prepared nurses need to be aware of ethical issues surrounding the use of patient information, technology, and the respective liabilities.

Reference:
Croll, P. (2010). Privacy, security and access with sensitive health information. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 151, 167–175.

To prepare:
• focus on the ethical and legal issues associated with usage of data and health information.
• For this Discussion, identify an ethical issue related to data collection or information management at your organization or one with which you are familiar.
• Determine the potential liabilities that this ethical issue presents by reviewing the IMIA Code of Ethics.
• Consider the legal aspects of your ethical issue and the steps that could be taken to avoid or minimize risk.
1. Describe your selected ethical issue.
2. Analyze the potential liabilities that this issue poses to the organization by referencing the IMIA Code of Ethics.
Formulate strategies that the organization could implement to address the ethical issue.

Leading And Managing A Change In Clinical Practice Nursing Essay

I had seen many patients’ complains of complex wounds that need long time to cure. Complex wounds are considered as a real challenge to the health care providers especially when it is accompanied with factors that can play role in impaired and complicate wound healing such as Surgery, infection, the presence of diabetes, Trauma, Radiation, Autoimmune diseases and arteriosclerosis. As stated by Ferreira. M, 2006: The most commonly seen complex wounds that require special care and attention are Wounds in the lower extremity of diabetic patients, Pressure ulcers, Chronic venous ulcers, Wounds following extensive necrotic processes caused by infections and Chronic wounds related to vasculitis and immunosuppressive therapy that have not healed using simple care.

There is no specialized and responsible team who can determine the best type of management for the patients with complex wounds. The health care provider in the hospital is providing the same care and management to the patients who complaining of simple or complex wounds. They need to know that There are striking differences between simple wounds, for example surgical wounds or skin scratches, and those chronic wounds that do not heal primarily and demand specialized care, mostly in hospitals (Ferreira. M, 2006) .This will harm the patient (physically and emotionally), decrease the quality of care that provides to the patients, delay wound healing and increase the period of hospitalization.

The care provided for patients with wounds can be described in one single word which it’s DRESSING. While the treatment of the complex wound is much complicated. Determining that the majority of these complex wounds should be considered surgical cases and not just cases for dressings as stated by Ferreira. M. 2006. The treatment of complex wounds should be by using surgical procedures instead of the clinical measures. In addition to debridements, skin grafting, and flap coverage.

Health care providers (doctors, nurses, etc) need to increase their awareness about the important of the presence of wound management team in each hospital to decide the best type of management, decrease the complexity of the treatment and choose the best surgical approaches that will increase the quality of life to the patient.

Step 2

A complicated wound needs more than just a bandage to recover and heal. It needs special attention; compassion of a wound care team who are specializes in non-healing and slow to heal wounds. As stated by Tjandra. J, 2001Wound healing is the replacement of destroyed tissue by living tissue, and is fundamental to survival.

My vision is to form a team of professionals who work together to assess patient’s wound and provide input regarding their treatment. This team consists of physicians, physical therapists, dietitians and nurses “wound therapy nurses and nurses specialized in complex wounds”. These specialized wound nurses may visit patients in their home in order to provide an effective plan to heal their wounds.

They have to work on providing appropriate wound care to the patients that will help the complex wound to heal faster. As well as they should know that “Wound healing may be impaired by general factors such as malnutrition, corticosteroids, diabetes mellitus and anaemia, which affect the patient as a whole. And local factors such as infection, ischaemia and hematoma which affect the site of the wound (Tjandra. J, 2001)”.

In addition to cleansing, control bacterial growth and prevent infection. This team will also provides education to patients and their families to help prevent any future complications, increase there awareness regard complex wounds and their demands to heal, encourage them to collaborate with the team and participate in the treatment. This change will enhance the quality of care patients received; improve the quality of life, decrease the period of hospitalization and promote the process of healing.

“It is important that all practitioners are aware of the pathophysiology and aetiology of pressure ulcers and mechanisms to prevent pressure ulcer development (Ousey, K, 2005) because Patients with complex wounds need to spend long period in the hospital so they will be at high risk of develop bed sore. Team members should coordinate program to prevent pressure ulcer that will protect the patient from getting this series skin problem.

This change will build up a very strong team who are able to put the patient on the right way of cure and make them able to treat the complex wounds in time less than the expected. It is a real chance for all the health care provider specially nurses toward increasing their knowledge and improving there skills. Wound care team consider as a good step towards improving the health care services in the hospital.

Step 3 & 4

Leadership is a very important concept in nursing professional that helps to develop the skills of nurses and the other health care professionals. I will be able to achieve my vision by using one of the most important models in leaderships and management. It is John Adair’s Leadership model. Adair has developed what he calls a functional approach to leadership based on three overlapping circles of needs which are achieving the task, managing the team or group and managing individuals (Cipd 2010).

By adopting this model of leadership, my responsibilities as a leader to achieve the task are as follows: sharing my vision, goals, and objectives with the team members. Then, create an action plan to achieve the task, considering timescales and strategies. It is important to share my action plan with the members and ask them for feedback or suggestions. After that I will distribute responsibilities by agreement and delegation, monitor and maintain overall performance against plan and report the progress toward the team aim continuously. Finally review, reassess, adjust plan, methods as necessary.

In addition to that I will encourage and motivate the members to be involved in making decisions and giving suggestions, to make the task a success and meet our goals. The leader should try to resolve any groups’ conflicts and look for ways to develop a cooperative team working. However, to develop each nurse and improve her skills, we will recognize the team member as individuals, and get to know their strengths and needs, we have to help them and encourage them to challenge the complex cases of wounds. It is very important to give awards and recognitions to the individual’s hard efforts and work.

Therefore, to achieve my vision and reveal the benefits of this change I will apply Lewin’s three- stage model of change. It is a holistic model that helps people to think about the change and gradually adopt it as pointed out by martin (2003). Lewin proposed 3 stages for any changes to occur, including: the unfreezing stage is when people start to believe that there is a need for change, the moving stage, when it is possible to make changes, and the refreezing stage is when the change is strengthened and becomes the new normal state (martin 2003).

In the unfreezing stage team members must realize that they will be able to treat any type of complex wounds and promote wound healing if they work on improve their knowledge and skills. They will see the importance of act as one collaborative group to enhance the quality of care and promote wound healing.

As stated by Reinelt (2010) Evidence-based practice (EBP) is commonly used to inform practice decisions in the fields of medicine, nursing, social work, child welfare, and criminal justice. So it is important to provide the team with some evidence based research that will guide decision-making about what treatments and protocols to use with individual patients, and offenders to ensure the highest possible accountability for producing good results. Reinelt (2010). In addition to that, I will invite nurses and doctors from other countries that are already implemented this idea in their hospitals and ask them to give presentation to our health care providers about their experience and discuses how this change can improve the quality of care and increase the benefits to the patients.

Throughout this stage, I will be expecting initial resistance to the change by some people but I will listen carefully to their opinions and issues, I will try to convince them of the important and the benefits of implementing this change. I will also encourage them to give suggestions that would help in achieving my vision.

In the moving stage, we will see the possibility of forming complex wound team in the hospital and improve member’s skills and knowledge. In this stage I will arrange for different teaching sessions and workshops that will help in increase members knowing, improve their therapeutic and communication skills, and enhance their confidence. One of the most important nursing leadership qualities is supporting your team, If the members of the team wish to develop new skills, or apply their theoretical knowledge in a practical environment, it is important that the leader provide a supportive environment for them to try out these skills. This will provide them with the true method of learning, and develop their skills in a competent manner (Lalwani, P. 2010). In addition, there will be a team supervisor who will distribute and organize the work between the members and promote team collaboration.

In the refreezing stage, the change is carried out and implemented, the team is working together to treat and promote healing of any difficult wounds. Leader should keep in mind that not every member can deal with stress and other such aspects of the profession very well. So, as a leader, I will need to support them, and understand and help them in a way that proves useful for them (Lalwani, P. 2010). The Leader is responsible of solving problems, encourage and motivate the members and introduce feedbacks, as stated by Lalwani, P. 2010, Feedback can, and should also be positive, as this will further encourage your team members to perform better and keep introducing innovative yet efficient ways of becoming independent. Therefore, there will be monitoring committee to observe team achievements, evaluate their understanding, knowledge and skills and recognize the benefits of this change for patients, families, and the healthcare providers. The findings will determine if we will carry on this change, stop it or create another action plan to overcome the difficulties and improve the outcomes.

Step5

As stated by Lalwani, P. 2010, my goal is ensure the betterment of the organization I am work for, by improving the quality of patient care, which I can do with the application of various creative leadership qualities and management strategies, and the different leadership styles in nursing. My action plan included many steps and events which will aid to achieve my vision and create wound management team consist of physicians and nurses specialize in the complex wounds. This will help to achieve my goals such as enhance the quality of care patients received, improve patient’s quality of life, and promote healing of the difficult wounds. In addition to improve health care provider’s knowledge and skills regarding the difficult wounds and the most important thing is create nurses specialize in wound therapy and make them able to treat any complicated wounds. So I think my action plan is fit well with my previous explanation and rational for change.

Conclusion

By the end of this assignment I discover that there are at least 8 qualities that successful leaders have: Responsibility, Integrity, Decision takers, Deal with facts, Vision and inspiration, Optimism, Resilient, and Excellence (Brodie, D. 2008). The Successful leaders are not just working to put themselves in good senior position but to use their skills, knowledge and all the leadership qualities for the growth of the organization that they are working for, provide high quality of care to the patients that will lead to patient satisfaction and play role in the progress of their health and well being. I can understand now that the leaders are those who are willing to follow. They must be perfect in whatever they do, because by doing their best; they will discover that only the best is expected from their team members.

– http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?pid=S1807-59322006000600014&script=sci_arttext

– Tjandra, J. Clunie, G. Thomas, R (2001). Text Book of Surgery/ Wound Healing and Wound Management. USA, Canada, Australia. 2nd ed., Pp 20, 23, 24, 25.

– Ousey. K, (2005) Pressure Area Care, UK.1st ed., Pp 13

– http://www.cipd.co.uk/subjects/maneco/leadership/leadshipovw.htm?IsSrchRes=1

– Martin, V. 2003 Leading change in health and social care, 1st ed., Routledge: London and New York, Pp. 104-06.

– http://leadershiplearning.org/blog/claire-reinelt/2010-06-29/use-evidence-based-practice-field-leadership-development

– http://www.buzzle.com/articles/nursing-leadership-qualities.html (Lalwani, P. 2010)

– http://ezinearticles.com/?The-8-Qualities-of-Successful-Leaders&id=760414

The Impact of Alert Fatigue in Healthcare

The 1990’s brought on the rapid development of digitalization within society; the share of the US population with internet access increased by 58 percent between December 1998 and August 2000. Computerization rapidly brought on changes to how the country communicated, received news and even shopped. It was inevitable that the healthcare sector would be the next to implement information technology and in 2001, the Institute of Medicine(IOM) further endorsed the importance of digitalizing healthcare. According to IOM, “information technology must play a central role in the redesign of the health care system if a substantial improvement in health care quality is to be achieved…”

[1]

The enactment of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) in March 2010, once more promoted the development of electronic health records to improve the quality of health care. Support for health information technology was deemed a necessary condition for many of ACA’s initiatives, and EHR implementation greatly expanded throughout the health care system.

[2]

The introduction of computerization into any arena has produced benefits, and with health care the rapidly increasing digitalization has been advantageous to both patients and providers. No longer did health care workers have to decipher physician handwriting that looked like Egyptian hieroglyphics. Clinical decision support would alert providers to drug allergies and interactions, barcode scanning would eliminate medication administration errors and pharmacy robots would select the correct medication to be dispensed to the patient.

However, the integration of technology into medicine has also endured many rough patches along the way. The introduction of newer and more sophisticated programs to the clinical environment and provider workflows have provided great benefits towards improving quality and patient safety but as with any new process implementation, there have been unintended and unanticipated consequences. Designs and products that were promoted to improve patient safety have resulted in new types of threats and medication errors. Technologies such as computerized provider order entry (CPOE), smart pump medication delivery devices and automated dispensing cabinets (ADC) are programmed to provide warnings to clinicians when unsafe situations arise, and interventions need to be made. However, on any given day there are a staggering number of alerts as well as multiple different alert-generating devices.

[3]

In one study, CPOE generated warnings for physicians on 3-6 percent of all orders that were entered. This translates into dozens of warnings per day and doesn’t even account for the number of warnings that are generated for pharmacists, who often receive the vast majority of alerts.

[4]

The term alert fatigue describes how busy health care clinicians become overwhelmed and desensitized to computer generated safety alerts and as a result, ignore or fail to respond appropriately to the warnings. Alert fatigue occurs when too many red flags are triggered across applications in which patient information is entered and can be compared to the law of diminishing returns in economics, to the saturation point in chemistry, and to Shakespeare’s As You Like It

,

“Why then, can one desire too much of a good thing?”

[5]

Unfortunately, the vast number of alerts that are generated by systems do not warrant action and deserve to be ignored. The threat to patient safety occurs when because of the high number of alerts, critical alerts that warn of impending serious harm are also ignored. Alert fatigue is now recognized as a major unintended consequence of health care computerization. The ECRI Institute, a nonprofit medical safety organization, listed alert fatigue as a top technology hazard.

[6]

The proliferation of alerts in electronic health records and supporting technologies was intended to improve patient safety but has resulted in a paradoxical increase in the likelihood that patients will be harmed.

[7]

While clinical alerts have been shown to reduce adverse effects of medications resulting in fewer deaths, disabilities and hospitalizations and subsequently lowering health care costs, they are not always beneficial and patient harm can occur when low value or false positive alerts appear. In one study, 331 alerts were needed to prevent one adverse drug event.

[8]

Consider the case of a teenager who received 38 times the normal dose of an antibiotic due to the clinical alert being overshadowed by a large number of clinically insignificant alerts. Pablo Garcia, 16 years old had a rare genetic disease known as NEMO syndrome which leads to a lifetime of frequent infections and bowel inflammation. In July 2013, he was admitted to UCSF Medical Center to undergo a routine colonoscopy. He received a bowel prep regimen that night as well as his evening medications which included steroids and antibiotics. Soon after, he began complaining of numbness tingling and the on-call physician was summoned. It was then discovered that Pablo had received 38.5 tablets of Septra, 37.5 more tablets than what he should have, and the next morning Pablo suffered a grand mal seizure due to the overdose. This error began with a physician entering an order into the EHR upon patient admission. Pablo took one tablet of Septra DS twice daily as prophylaxis for his skin infections. This dose was appropriate for him and the physician wanted to continue this same dose upon admission. UCSF Medical Center used Epic as their electronic health record and while dose limits can be programmed into the EHR, UCSF had decided not to set limits on doses because it was a teaching hospital. The hospital treated many patients with rare diseases who were also on research protocols and in these patients, high or unusual doses of medications would usually have been acceptable. Additionally, for pediatric patients the informatics committee had decided to require weight-based dosing for every patient under 40 kg. If dose rounding was necessary to conform with commercially available strengths and the change in dose was greater than 5% of the calculated dose, the policy stated that the pharmacist would contact the physician to ensure the conversion was acceptable. Pablo weighed 38.6 kg and so the calculated dose of Septra was 5 mg/kg of Trimethoprim or 193 mg. The closest commercially available dose to 193 mg was 160 mg, or one tablet of Septra DS. When the physician chose to continue with this dose, she was under the assumption that she was ordering one tablet. The order then populated to the pharmacist verification queue as 193 mg, which was 17% greater than the available 160 mg tablet and prompted the pharmacist to contact the physician per policy. The physician then attempted to reorder the dose as 160 mg, but accidentally entered the dose as 160 mg/kg because that was how the default dosing was set up in Epic based on this patient’s weight. Upon doing this, the dose was calculated as 6,160 mg or 38.5 tablets. The physician continued with signing the order and an alert fired warning her of the overdose, but she took no action.

UCSF Medical Center had chosen to disable thousands of alerts built into the Epic database, however despite this decision pharmacists still received pop-up alerts and of the 350,000 medication orders processed per month, pharmacists received pop-up alerts on half of them. In the course of one month, physicians received 17,000 alerts. In this case, the physician assumed that the alert she was receiving was yet another alert with no clinical significance and so she paid no attention to it. Additionally, the senior residents at the medical center were known to advise juniors to simply ignore all alerts and pop-ups and so the physician felt quite comfortable ignoring the alert. The order then made its way back to the pharmacist who only saw the 160, which is what he was expecting since this is what he had communicated to the physician. Of note, the 6,160 mg dose ordered looked deceivingly similar to 160 mg and while a massive overdose had just been ordered, the alert that fired in Epic for both the physician and the pharmacist looked like any other alert; nothing highlighted the severity of the overdose. The pharmacy satellite where the pharmacist was stationed was cramped and very busy. He was constantly being interrupted by phone calls and continually answering the door for nurses who were coming to pick up medications. It was not unusual to be interrupted up to 6-7 times while working on any given patient’s medication order and so it was not a surprise that he also overrode the alert. It is a known fact that every interruption in the medication process increases the possibility of an error occurring exponentially. Once the order was verified by the pharmacist, the pharmacy robot then dutifully prepared the dose and implemented the dispensing process as it was designed to do. The nurse who administered the dose was unfamiliar with the unit, was inexperienced and afraid to speak up, and the barcode medication administration technology and eMar system falsely reassured her and so Pablo Garcia received 38.5 tablets of Septra.

James Reason’s swiss cheese model of error holds that all complex organizations harbor many latent errors, or mistakes waiting to happen. On most occasions, the errors are caught in time and even if the first layer of protection is breached, the second or third layer will catch them. When all the layers are breached, the swiss cheese holes have aligned and the system has failed, thereby resulting in an error. After the 1999 report by the IOM which estimated that nearly 100,000 patients in the United States die per year due to medication errors, a massive patient safety movement was launched, and computerization was touted as a promising fix. Computerization in health care did solve many problems such as illegible handwriting, or misplaced decimals, but also added increased complexities and additional challenges and new hazards. Pablo Garcia did survive the massive Septra overdose, but a failure of multiple layers aligned the holes perfectly. Reason also states that most errors which occur are caused by competent people and fortifying the system by adding layers or shrinking the holes is much more productive than blaming the people.

After this incident, one of the steps that UCSF Medical Center took to prevent an error of this nature from occurring again was to tackle the issue of alert fatigue by forming a committee to review alerts and two years later only 30 percent of alerts have been removed. These are the types of issues the health care industry is facing; finding a balance between too many alerts along with not removing alerts that have the potential to benefit patient safety.

[9]

The tragic death of a 12-year-old child with congenital long QT syndrome in 2015 highlights the need for clinical decision support systems and brings to light the failure of one hospital that chose to disable alerts. A physician prescribed Zithromax for this child to treat otitis media and sinusitis using the hospital’s EHR system. Zithromax has been associated with QT interval prolongation and after taking the medication for four days, the child developed torsade’s and died despite efforts to save her. Citing alert fatigue, the hospital had disabled the drug-disease state alerts from firing, therefore no warning fired for the physician or the pharmacist.

[10]

CPOE alerts represent a small fraction of the alerts that health-care workers receive on any given day. A 2011 investigation by the Boston Globe found that between January 2005 and June 2010, alarm malfunction or alarm fatigue was attributed to 216 deaths in the US.

[11]

In early 2013, Barbara Drew, a UCSF researcher set out to quantify the problem of alarm fatigue in the UCSF Medical Center 66-bed ICU. A total of 381,560 audible alerts fired during a 31-day period, or 187 alarms per bed per day. Of the alerts that fired for arrhythmias, 89 percent were found to be false positives.

[12]

Studies on alert fatigue consistently show three main findings. First, that alerts are only modestly effective at best. Second, that alert fatigue is common, and clinicians generally override the vast majority of alerts, including those deemed to be critical and having the potential to cause serious harm. According to a prominent Harvard Medical School professor, clinicians override alerts between 49-96 percent of the time.

[13]

Lastly, that the more alerts clinicians receive, the higher the potential for alert fatigue. While this finding is intuitive, consequences of alert fatigue have the likelihood of increasing over time and therefore, alert fatigue has become a high-profile patient safety issue. In April 2015, The Joint Commission released a sentinel event alert calling for health care organizations to play close attention to information technology as a safety issue and in order to mitigate alert fatigue, it was recommended that the culture of safety be improved by creating a shared sense of responsibility between platform developers and the end users.3

Busy clinicians rely on equipment and technology to carry out the life-saving interventions that are they are trained to do, and it is assumed that technology will improve patient outcomes, but interactions between machines and the people who rely on them sometimes increases the risk of a disastrous occurrence. Human factors engineering is the discipline that attempts to identify and address these issues and takes into account human strengths and limitations in the design of interactive systems that involve people and technology to ensure safety and effectiveness. It focuses on how systems work in actual practice and attempts to optimize safety and minimize risk of errors in complex environments. Human factors engineering has been used in to improve safety in industries such as aviation and automobile but its application to healthcare is relatively recent.

[14]

Solving alert fatigue will also require a marriage between informatics and human factors engineering because the fundamental problem arises from the technology itself and the interaction of busy humans with the technology. Pablo Garcia was nearly killed by a medication error and this error demonstrates that solutions to computerized systems and human factors need to be broadly based and aligned. When staff involved in this incidence were questioned, one of the issues discovered was the fact that the clinicians trusted the computers more than they trusted themselves. As the computers generate their accuracy and trustworthiness, the bias grows.9

The aviation industry provides an example of how human factors engineering has improved safety because like medicine, aviation professionals have to perform tasks in high-stakes environments and the approach that aviation has taken has been learned from tragedies. The aviation industry has taken steps to prioritize warnings and cockpit alerts and has worked very hard to avoid false positives to prevent pilots from tuning out. Alerts are separated by hierarchy of significance; red lights, flashes, voice alerts and stick shaking indicate an impending stall and action needs to be taken immediately to prevent the plane from falling out of the sky. The next level of alerts are warnings that require immediate attention but do not directly threaten the flight path; red lights, voice alarm but no stick shaking and there are about 40 of these. Of note, the color red is only used for high level warnings. The next level is a caution and there are about 150 of these situations. Caution requires immediate awareness, but not instant action. With cautions, the lights and text are amber, and there is only one visual alert. The final level is an advisory where no action is required, but the pilot should be aware of it. Advisory alerts are amber text messages. For every kind of alert, a checklist automatically pops up on a central screen to help guide the crew to a solution and are programmed to match the triggered problem. Boeing utilizes a team of experts who make the judgment call and unlike in health care, resist the urge to warn the flight crew about everything. Because of this process, less than 10 percent of flights have any alerts triggered.9

The use of human factors engineering and deep attention to the experience of the end-user has thus far been lacking in health care technology design. While many steps can be taken to address alert fatigue, it’s important to point out that system developers have been reluctant to remove alerts due to fear of litigation and being held liable in the event that patients are harmed in the absence of a warning.

[15]

While the program developers have been slow to address the excessive number of alerts, functionality is present in the software that allows hospitals and health-systems to turn alerts off.

One step that can be taken to address the sheer number of alerts is increasing specificity and eliminating inconsequential alerts. Taskforces consisting of informatics personnel, administration and end-users must be established and this takes time, money and manpower. The team should review why alerts are firing and how they can be tweaked. To address ongoing issues, Group Health Cooperative of South Central Wisconsin (GHC-SCW) undertook such an initiative. The initiative included a holistic strategy that leveraged industry-accepted metrics and clinical staff input. They were able to implement a filtering strategy that reduced the number of alerts firing which resulted in more relevant alerts being delivered to providers. Within 60 days, they noticed that instead of overriding alerts, providers were taking action on nearly twice the number of alerts as before.

[16]

While reducing or eliminating the number of alerts is important, it is not the only strategy that should be used to combat this complex issue. Targeted alerts based on patient characteristics and indicators such as lab results or test results should also be developed. Epic Systems is working on developing software that might target alerts based on patients’ health conditions. This occurs by including more parameters and filters into the data. For example, incorporating renal function tests results into the alert system so that alerts for nephrotoxic medications are triggered only for those patients that are at a higher risk. Another example where a targeted alert system would be beneficial is in a cancer patient who needs higher doses of pain medications than recommended. A smart system would be able to differentiate this type of patient from one who would not need the high doses, or when a patient has an allergy to penicillin flagged but has taken a cephalosporin in the past without issue and the clinical decision support system is able to differentiate and not fire another alert when a subsequent order for cephalosporins is entered. Such a change could limit distractions so that clinicians focus on the alerts that matter for that specific patient.

A third mechanism by which alert fatigue could be better managed is by utilizing a tiered alert system. Warnings would be presented in different ways according to their severity and clinical consequence, similar to how aviation has handled alerts in aircraft. Only the most severe interactions would require hard stops and interruptions. Anecdotal experience suggests that how alerts are presented can have a major impact on compliance rates, but there are few studies comparing how alerts are presented. In 2005, Partners Health Care performed a retrospective analysis of data on hospitalized patients at two academic medical centers during a one-year period. Both inpatient CPOE systems used the same alert service, but one displayed alerts by severity level, using a tiered presentation while the other did not. For the tiered system, the alerting modules only required a response by the clinician for severe interactions and less serious ones presented in a non-interruptive fashion. The tiered system was set up with three levels of alerts; Level 1 alerts are the most serious and are considered to be life-threatening. Level 1 alerts are set up as hard stops and the clinician is required to either cancel the order being entered or discontinue the pre-existing order. Level 2 alerts are less serious, but still require action by the clinician. The clinician is required to either discontinue one of the drugs or select an override reason. Overriding alert reasons are set up as a pick list with the most frequent override reasons. Multiple reasons may be selected, and text can be added if a suitable reason is not selected. The largest proportion of alerts is in Level 3, which is also the least serious. Alerts are presented as information only and require no action of any kind from the clinician and no keystroke is needed because the presentation uses the available screen. 71,350 alerts were reviewed, of which approximately 39,000 occurred at the non-tiered site and 32,000 at the tiered site. Compliance at the tiered site was significantly higher with 100% of the most severe alerts accepted, vs. on 34% at the non-tiered site. The moderately severe, or Level 2 alerts were also more likely to be accepted at the tiered site.

[17]

This is one type of tiered alert system. Other types of tiered alerts utilize color coding to differentiate between the types of alerts; red color for severe warnings and interruptive hard stops, yellow for moderate and less severe. After Pablo Garcia was overdosed on Septra, aside from forming a committee to review alerts, UCSF Medical Center blocked any effort to prescribe more than nine pills in a single dose. This can also become complex and have unintended consequences, especially in the age of drug shortages where sometimes the only strengths available are low doses and there is potential for more units being needed to make the dose prescribed.

Alert fatigue and the unintended consequences of health care computerization is only recently recognized but has become a high-profile patient safety issue. There is intense interest in developing specific methods to combat alert fatigue but no consensus on how to pave the way forward. UCSF Medical Center formed a committee to review all of their alerts and after two years, had only succeeded in removing about 30 percent of alerts from the system. The sophisticated analytics are not there, even from the software developer, Epic. It will be imperative for clinicians and developers to work together in order to tackle these issues. Clinicians must be willing to provide meaningful input so that the developers can design the technologies with the functionality that addresses the needs of clinical decision support.

Aside from the required informatics principles, solving alert fatigue will require human factors engineering principles when designing the alerts because the problem arises not just from the technology, but the human interaction with the technology. In the case of Pablo Garcia, the error by the pharmacist was owed in part to the working conditions in the pharmacy and the number of interruptions he was experiencing. Making health care safer also requires that organizations develop a just culture of safety, making it possible for every employee to speak up if they feel unsure and would like to question, and not feeling like they will be reprimanded when something goes wrong. Additionally, it is imperative that we not over-trust the technology and assume that it is correct; critical thinking must continue to exist and thrive.

Alert fatigue is a complex and growing health care safety concern that will continue and increase in existence with the increase in reliance on computerization. While computerization has made many things in health care safer, one of the biggest unintended consequence of digitalization is alert fatigue. The issue is complex and while system developers can tailor alerts to an extent, they are reluctant to do so due to liability concerns. A potential solution to this is stronger governmental regulation and guidelines to allow for minimization of alert fatigue and improved safety performance of decision support systems. Since there is no clear consensus form a national perspective, there are steps that hospitals and health systems can take to tailor their systems and increase compliance to enhance safety. This includes increasing alert specificity and removing inconsequential alerts, tailoring alerts specific to patient characteristics and disease states, tiering alerts based on their severity and applying interruptive alerts only to high severity levels. In addition to the informatic fixes, the health care industry in collaboration with the system developers must utilize human factors engineering principles in the designing of alerts. A multi-faceted approach is required to tackle this complex and significant patient safety issue.


References:



[1]

Committee on Quality of Health Care in America, Institute of Medicine. Crossing the quality chasm: A new health system for the 21st century. National Academies Press: 2001, 147.


[2]

Fontenot, S. The Affordable Care Act and Electronic Health Records. PEJ. November 2013:72-76.

https://sarahfontenot.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/5-Dec-2013-Will-EHRs-Improve-Quality-Article.pdf

. Accessed December 4, 2018.


[3]

Alert Fatigue. AHRQ Patient Safety Network.

https://psnet.ahrq.gov/primers/primer/28/alert-fatigue

. August 2018. Accessed December 4, 2018.


[4]

Isaac, T et al. Overrides of Medication Alerts in Ambulatory Care. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(3):305-311.


[5]

Cash, J. Alert Fatigue. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy December 2009, 66 (23) 2098-2101.

http://www.ajhp.org/content/66/23/2098

. Accessed December 6, 2018.


[6]

ECRI Institute. Top 10 health technology hazards for 2015: a report from Health Devices. November 2014.


https://www.ecri.org/Documents/White_papers/Top_10_2015.pdf


. Accessed December 4, 2018.


[7]

Ash JS, et al. The extent and importance of unintended consequences related to computerized provider order entry. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007; 14:415-423.


[8]

Rush, J, et al. Improving Patient Safety by Combating Alert Fatigue.


J Grad Med Educ


. 2016 Oct; 8(4): 620–621. Accessed December 4, 2018.


[9]

Wachter R. The Digital Doctor: Hope, Hype, and Harm at the Dawn of Medicine’s Computer Age. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2015.


[10]

The Absence of a Drug-Disease Interaction Alert Leads to a Child’s Death. ISMP. May 21,2015.

https://www.ismp.org/resources/absence-drug-disease-interaction-alert-leads-childs-death

. Accessed December 8, 2018.


[11]

Kowalczyk, L. No Easy Solutions for Alarm Fatigue. Boston Globe. February 14, 2011.

http://archive.boston.com/lifestyle/health/articles/2011/02/14/no_easy_solutions_for_alarm_fatigue/?page=full

. Accessed December 8, 2018.


[12]

Drew, B., et al. Insights into the Problem of Alarm Fatigue with Physiologic Monitor Devices: A Comprehensive Observational Study of Consecutive Intensive Care Unit Patients. PLOS. October 22, 2014.

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0110274

. Accessed December 8, 2018.


[13]

Van der Sijs H, et al. Overriding of drug safety alerts in computer physician order entry. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006; 13:138–47.


[14]

Human Factors Engineering. AHRQ Patient Safety Network.

https://psnet.ahrq.gov/primers/primer/20/Human-Factors-Engineering

. August 2018. Accessed December 7, 2018.


[15]

Kesselheim, A, et al. Clinical Decision Support Systems Could Be Modified To Reduce ‘Alert Fatigue’ While Still Minimizing The Risk Of Litigation. Health Aff (Millwood). 2011; 30:2310-2317.


[16]

Presti, C. Combatting Alert Fatigue: Holistically Reducing Noise at the Point of Care. Pharmacy Times. August 24, 2015.

https://www.pharmacytimes.com/publications/directions-in-pharmacy/2015/august2015/combatting-alert-fatigue-holistically-reducing-noise-at-the-point-of-care

. Accessed December 6, 2018.


[17]

Paterno MD, et al. Tiering drug–drug interaction alerts by severity increases compliance rates. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009; 16:40-46.

Security a has an expected return of 7%- a standard deviation of

Questions6-3 – Security A has an expected return of 7%, a standard deviation of returns of 35%, a correlation coefficient with the market of -0.3, and a beta coefficient of -1.5, Security B has an expected return of 12%, a standard deviation of returns of 10%, a correlation with the market of 0.7, and a beta coefficient of 1.0. Which security is riskier? Why?7-2 – Two investors are evaluating General Electric’s stock for possible purchase. They agree on the expected value of D1 and also on the expected future dividend growth rate. Further, they agree on the risk of the stock. However, one investor normally holds stocks for 2 years and the other normally holds stocks for 10 years. On the basis of the type of analysis done in this chapter, they should both be willing to pay the same price for General Electric’s stock. True or false? Explain.Problems6-2 – (Required rare of return) – Assume that the risk-free rate is 6% and that the expected return on the market is 13%. What is the required rate of return on a stock that has a beta of 0.7?6-6 – (Required rare of return) – Suppose rRF = 5%, rM = 10%, and rA = 12%. A. Calculate Stock A’s beta. B. If Stock A’s beta were 2.0, then what would A’s new required rate of return?7-1 – (DPS Calculation) – Thress Industries just paid a dividend of $1.50 a share (i.e., D0 = $1.50). The dividend is expected to grow 5% a year for the next 3 years and then 10% a year there-after. What is the expected dividend per share for each of the next 5 years?7-8 – (Preferred stock rare of return) – What is the nominal rate of return on a preferred stock with a $100 par value, a stated dividend of 8% of par, and a current market price of (a) $60, (b) $80, (c) $100, and (d) $140? U can also download BA/350 Week 8 Final Exam Sum and Case study.Just click on below Link http://www.homeworkmarket.com/content/ba350-week-8-final-exam-ba350-week-8-final-exam-ba-350-week-8-final-exam  http://www.homeworkmarket.com/content/ba350-week-8-case-study-solution-ba350-week-8-case-study-solution

Ethical Issues of Clinical Ethics in the Developing World

Ethical Issues of Clinical Ethics And Research Ethics In The Developing World And Pakistan: Is There Any Solution?


Abstract:

Health research plays an important role in addressing the inequities in human development and health, but in order to achieve these objectives, research should be based on ethical principles and sound scientific knowledge. Although it is accepted fact that bioethics play a pivotal role in health related research in the developing countries, much of recent debate has focused on the controversies surrounding internationally sponsored research and it has taken place largely without the adequate participation of developing countries. The relationship between the ethical guidelines and regulations, and also indigenously/locally sponsored and public health research is not adequately explored and so needs further exploration.


Discussion

Globally, there are wide inequalities in the economic development, in health outcomes, in burden of diseases and it is certain that the accelerating course towards globalization, without requisite safeguards and the protection of human rights, will only worsen the health inequalities. The funding of research in the developing countries has been the subject and debate of much attention recently. The forum for global health research has indicated that less than 10 % of the world’s research resources are earmarked for 90 % of the health problems. Recently, there was considerable debate regarding ethical conduct and the reviewing of health related research, but this debate has mostly taken place among the bioethicists and researchers in the industrialized countries.

The view points of public health researchers and practitioners from the developing countries have been underrepresented. Research needs to respond to the community needs and also national priorities, and development of a national research agenda in the developing countries must be firmly grounded in the process of priority setting. However a more difficult challenge is to involve communities themselves in the research questions and to link their research to their development. Pakistan, being a poor country, has very limited health care resources.

Treatment options for individual patients and between patients for free and subsidized treatments are common ethical dilemmas. Thus, prioritizing illnesses and people is an enormous ethical challenge and a very common part of every day medical practice in Pakistan. A review of published discourse on ethics in Pakistan reveals several general trends. These include a focus on ‘medicine’ as defined by formal western medical practice, delivered by physicians only.

There is no pursuit of ethics as a focus of the work of other health professionals. The physician-authors of papers, the types of journals where papers have been published, and the physician dominant mode of health care, especially curative health care, in Pakistan make this understandable. Research ethics have not been captured in the published papers in Pakistan. This is an area of great importance that has escaped notice of the national thinkers and policy-makers. The conduct of appropriate and ethical research in international settings has been the focus of recent international reports. Ethical review committees, institutional review boards, and other national mechanisms to protect human subjects need to be discussed and put into place in Pakistan, as may be the case in other developing countries.

Additional work is required to explore this important area within the context of the developing world. (1). The vital links between clinical and research ethics and human rights are perhaps of even greater significance in developing countries, where human rights are frequently ignored and violated. Conducting research in hierarchical, traditional countries such as Pakistan adds yet another dimension to the difficulties in assuring that it is done in an ethical manner; an “indigenous” layer of cultural norms makes it even more of an uphill task, but it is a task that we are morally bound to shoulder.

The historical and social construct of the Pakistan culture, the socioeconomic realities (with similarities to other countries in this region) and some of the deeply rooted values and customs pose challenges that are specific to this part of the world. We who live here know them, and only we can address them. Perhaps the most important factor that places human subjects at risk in this part of the world is the magnification of “power differentials” inherent in hierarchical societies such as Pakistan.

This difference is particularly pronounced in the interactions between physicians and scientists and those they take care of or enroll in research projects. In Pakistan, scientists and physicians constitute the “elite” section of society. They are by and large the “English-Speaking”, affluent, highly educated minority in a society where the majority of those they deal with in their professional lives are “Urdu-Speaking”, poor, generally illiterate or misinformed and disadvantaged in many other ways.

(2). Local researchers trained within the country have no concept of research ethics. There is a growing awareness that research cannot progress without better research ethics systems in developing countries. At the close of the last century several of the international agencies involved in funding health research, including WHO, tried to seriously examine the role of health research as an important contributor to sustainable human development. They also attempted to assess how governance of research at national, regional and global levels be made more effective and efficient. Ethical practice in health care and research is not only needed to ensure equity in health care and research, but also to project individuals and communities from unnecessary risks and harm.

(3).We can make clinical research more ethical in Pakistan by following all the International guidelines regarding clinical research ethics. Health research can play a crucial role in improving national and global health by developing and evaluating interventions and by exploring strategies that can empower individuals to alter unhealthy behaviors. However, health research involves human subjects and such individuals might be harmed by their participation in research. Accordingly, a strong system of ethical review is needed to enhance the protections of the rights and welfare of human subjects. Also, to enhance the public trust in research activities, investigators need to subscribe to a strict code of ethics that equals the highest standard of respect for human rights. This framework thus places ethics at the very core of a country’s programs for health and development.

(4). There are five key ethical principles of ethical research that appear across the ethical codes of research institutions and associations. These are

a) informed and voluntary consent;

b) confidentiality of information shared;

c) anonymity of research participants;

d) beneficence or no harm to participants; and

e) reciprocity.

Researchers are expected to obtain informed consent from all those who are directly involved in research or in the vicinity of research. This principle adheres to a larger issue of respect to the participants so that they are not coerced into participation and have access to relevant information prior to the consent. Usually consent is obtained through written consent forms, and necessary elements of consent are identified by the review committees.

These usually include prior information on key elements of research such as purpose, procedures, time period, risks, benefits, and a clause stipulating that participation is voluntary and the participants have the right to withdraw from the study. The principles of confidentiality of information shared and Anonymity of Research participants is also concerned with offering respect and protection to research participants through assurance of confidentiality of information shared and anonymity by not revealing the identity of the individuals and institutions involved. Typically anonymity is provided through the use of pseudonyms.

The principles of Nonmaleficence, Beneficence and Reciprocity bounds the researchers to provide the participants with an outline of the risks and benefits involved to the participants in the study. The principle of reciprocity requires that the researchers consider actively ways through which participants could be compensated for their time and effort. Typically information about risks and benefits are expected to be provided in summary in the consent form and/or in a brief write up attached with the consent form.

These principles and procedures of an ethical engagement with a research study are laid out with the best of intentions to protect participants from malpractices and breach of ethics. However, the approach is taken from a mainly clinical medical research perspective with a concomitant view of epistemology and ontology. Hence, it is assumed that there is a well stated hypothesis which is to be tested, the relationship between the researcher and researched is clearly divided and bounded, and it is possible to outline the potential risks and benefits in some detail prior to the study.

(5).The two salient concerns of public-health ethics in our Pakistan case are social justice as a background motivation and accountability as the primary operational objective. The formation of Pakistan’s NBC resulted from PMRC’s active involvement in documenting the under-distribution of global health research benefits to populations in LMICs (low and middle income countries). While this disparity might be seen as a failure of social justice on a global scale, redressing the 10/90 gap is in part a matter of domestic social justice, i-e, of how the benefits and burdens of social cooperation are distributed within each Sovereign State. Closing the gap would require governments of LMICs, such as Pakistan, to participate in dramatically increasing the amount of health research undertaken for the benefit of their own populations. Ensuring accountability for the conduct of this research with human subjects requires that protocols undergo independent ethical review.

(6). A systems perspective will enable research stakeholders to improve their understanding and implementation of a national health research system (HRS) in order to improve health outcomes and health equity. Knowledge produced by health research, if disseminated widely, is a global public good. Knowledge contributes to the policies, activities, and performance of health systems, and to the improvement of individual’s and population’s health. The process of conducting research ethics and utilizing knowledge is a highly complex one.

One glaring symptom of the current weakness of HRS across countries is that the research process and the policy process tend to exist in different worlds, with the result that research often has a limited impact on policy. Researchers and decision-makers tend to interact only around the “products” of their processes-for example, the results of a study for the researchers and a set of priorities for the decision-maker. Clearly, more attention needs to be given to establishing and maintaining ongoing links between the two words and, as noted previously, taking stock of the non-linearity of the research-policy-practice processes.

(7). Bleak and confusing as the field may be, the last few years have been a watershed in international bioethics and the heightened debate has pushed ethical issues surrounding health research in developing countries into the limelight. The challenge is to develop sound plan for expanding this ethics debate to larger issues of the global justice and equity, and to make the process as participatory and democratic as possible. The main goal in all these activities should be reduction of the global inequalities in health. Most of public health related problems in South Asia and their immediate causes are related to distal factors such as illiteracy, poverty, societal and gender inequities. The underlying issues must be understood to develop meaningful and sustainable solutions.

(8).This will take time, but this is the only way to bring about true change in ethics of international health research.


References

  1. Adnan A. Hyder and Sarah Nadeem. Health Ethics in Pakistan: A Literature Review of Its Present State. J Health Popul Nutr. 2001, 19(1): 6-11.
  1. Farhat Moazam. Research and developing countries: hopes and hypes. East Mediterranean Health Journal. 2006, Vol. 12 (Supplement no. 1): 30-36.
  1. Mohammad Afzal. Health research in the World Health Organization Regional Office for the Eastern Mediterranean. East Mediterranean Health Journal. Vol. 14: 67-73.
  1. Mohammad Abdur Rab Et Al. Ethical Practices for Health Research in the Eastern Mediterranean Region of the World Health Organization: A Retrospective Data Analysis. Plos one. 2008, Vol. 3(5); e2094.
  1. Anjum Halai. Ethics in Qualitative Research: Issue and Challenges. Edqual Working Paper. 2006, Quality no. 5: 1-13.
  1. Adnan A. Hyder Et Al. Integrating ethics, health policy and health systems in low-and middle–income countries: case studies from Malaysia and Pakistan. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2008, 86(8): 606-611.
  1. Tikki Pang Et Al. Knowledge for better health-a conceptual framework and foundation for health research systems. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2003, 81(11): 815-820.
  1. Zulfiqar Ahmed Bhutta. Globalization, Structural Adjustments and Public Health in South Asia: What does it mean for International Networking in Health Research and Researcher Training? 2001, 1-23.